PWSvsQDFETF Comparison
VS
PACER WEALTHSHIELD ETF (PWS) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Other segment. FlexShares Quality Dividend Index Fund ETF (QDF) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. PWS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, QDF's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. PWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.4% for QDF. PWS is up 2.55% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. QDF performs better with 13.69% YTD performance, and -$71M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PWS and QDF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PWS vs QDF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PWS QDF | +3.11%-0.27% | +5.90%+2.79% | +2.55%+13.69% | +8.35%+21.01% | +24.54%+63.16% | +9.47%+72.92% |
| Flows | PWS QDF | --$18M | -$2M-$132M | -$6M-$71M | -$6M-$248M | -$8M-$348M | -$26M-$374M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PWS QDF | +10.64%+11.85% | +11.43%+12.06% | +11.55%+14.26% | +11.70%+15.82% |
| Max drawdown | PWS QDF | -3.64%-3.59% | -6.97%-7.83% | -10.48%-18.14% | -25.07%-22.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | PWS QDF | 40d10d | 204d50d | 368d128d | 1432d560d |
Trading data
PWS | QDF | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.34 | $91.96 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $33.23 | $91.25 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PWS | QDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PWS | QDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.34 | $91.96 |
| 1D performance | +0.33% | +0.78% |
| AuM | $24.95 M | $2.21 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.4% |
Characteristics
PWS | QDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | FlexShares |
| Benchmark | Pacer Wealth Shield Index | Northern Trust Quality Dividend Index |
| N° of holdings | 350 | 114 |
| Asset class | Alternative | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2017 | December 14, 2012 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PWS
USA
90.62%
Other
9.38%
QDF
USA
96.07%
Other
3.93%
Sectors
PWS
Finance
20.49%
Technology
20.29%
Healthcare
18.74%
Industrials
17.46%
Energy
13.84%
Other
9.18%
QDF
Technology
40.69%
Finance
20.5%
Industrials
9.91%
Healthcare
9%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.22%
Other
12.69%
Advertisement
Diversification
PWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.64%
QDF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
49.14%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PWS
NVIDIA Corp.
4.19%
Apple, Inc.
3.91%
Chevron Corp.
3.48%
Microsoft Corp.
2.98%
Welltower, Inc.
2.76%
Prologis, Inc.
2.25%
Equinix, Inc.
1.68%
Broadcom Inc.
1.59%
ConocoPhillips
1.38%
GE Aerospace
1.35%
American Tower Corp.
1.35%
Caterpillar, Inc.
1.35%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
1.24%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
1.09%
RTX Corp.
1.04%
QDF
Apple, Inc.
8.59%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.27%
Broadcom Inc.
3.97%
Microsoft Corp.
3.93%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.93%
AbbVie, Inc.
2.91%
Johnson & Johnson
2.79%
GE Aerospace
2.59%
Lam Research Corp.
2.54%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.53%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.38%
Procter & Gamble Co.
2.26%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.93%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.88%
KLA Corp.
1.63%
Frequently asked questions about PWS and QDF
How have the PWS and QDF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 1, 2026, PWS is up 2.55% year-to-date (YTD), while QDF has returned 13.69%. That puts QDF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PWS or QDF?
Year-to-date, the PWS ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to -$71M for QDF.
Which ETF is more volatile: PWS or QDF?
Over the past year, PWS had a volatility of 11.43%, while QDF experienced 12.06%.
Which ETF is bigger: PWS or QDF?
As of September 1, 2026, PWS holds $24.95 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDF manages $2.21 B.
What sectors do the PWS and QDF ETFs invest in?
PWS leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, QDF focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the PWS ETF and QDF ETF?
PWS top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Chevron Corp.. QDF holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PWS or QDF?
PWS holds 352 securities with 31.64% of its assets in the top 15. QDF has 115 securities and a top 15 weight of 49.14%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PWS & QDF
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
October 20, 2023
QDF
Advertisement
Advertisement
