PWSvsDFACETF Comparison
VS
PACER WEALTHSHIELD ETF (PWS) belongs to the Multi-Asset: Other segment. Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAC) is part of the US All Cap segment. PWS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. In contrast, DFAC's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. PWS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.17% for DFAC. PWS is up 2.55% year-to-date (YTD) with -$6M in YTD flows. DFAC performs better with 15.27% YTD performance, and +$2.90B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PWS and DFAC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PWS vs DFAC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/01/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PWS DFAC | +3.11%+2.05% | +5.90%+2.77% | +2.55%+15.27% | +8.35%+22.16% | +24.54%+70.20% | +9.47%+73.46% |
| Flows | PWS DFAC | -+$279M | -$2M+$1.12B | -$6M+$2.90B | -$6M+$4.05B | -$8M+$10.45B | -$26M+$17.67B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PWS DFAC | +10.64%+11.93% | +11.43%+12.45% | +11.55%+15.19% | +11.70%+17.36% |
| Max drawdown | PWS DFAC | -3.64%-3.51% | -6.97%-8.50% | -10.48%-20.02% | -25.07%-23.21% |
| Max drawdown duration | PWS DFAC | 40d8d | 204d64d | 368d216d | 1432d707d |
Trading data
PWS | DFAC | |
Last sale 9/1/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.23 | $45.37 |
| Previous close 09/01/2026 | $33.29 | $45.07 |
| Consolidated volume 09/01/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
DFAC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPWS | DFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/1/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PWS | DFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.23 | $45.37 |
| 1D performance | -0.17% | +0.67% |
| AuM | $24.95 M | $49.14 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.17% |
Characteristics
PWS | DFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | Dimensional |
| Benchmark | Pacer Wealth Shield Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 350 | 2469 |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 11, 2017 | October 4, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PWS
USA
90.62%
Other
9.38%
DFAC
USA
95.47%
Other
4.53%
Sectors
PWS
Finance
20.49%
Technology
20.29%
Healthcare
18.74%
Industrials
17.46%
Energy
13.84%
Other
9.18%
DFAC
Technology
32.47%
Finance
15.79%
Industrials
10.71%
Healthcare
9.88%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.24%
Other
21.91%
Advertisement
Diversification
PWS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.64%
DFAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
29.98%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PWS
NVIDIA Corp.
4.19%
Apple, Inc.
3.91%
Chevron Corp.
3.48%
Microsoft Corp.
2.98%
Welltower, Inc.
2.76%
Prologis, Inc.
2.25%
Equinix, Inc.
1.68%
Broadcom Inc.
1.59%
ConocoPhillips
1.38%
GE Aerospace
1.35%
American Tower Corp.
1.35%
Caterpillar, Inc.
1.35%
Simon Property Group, Inc.
1.24%
Digital Realty Trust, Inc.
1.09%
RTX Corp.
1.04%
DFAC
NVIDIA Corp.
5.27%
Apple, Inc.
5.12%
Microsoft Corp.
4.41%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.15%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.73%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.69%
Broadcom Inc.
1.18%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.09%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.09%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.09%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.05%
Johnson & Johnson
0.84%
US30233Q1085
0.82%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
0.75%
Visa, Inc.
0.70%
Frequently asked questions about PWS and DFAC
How have the PWS and DFAC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 1, 2026, PWS is up 2.55% year-to-date (YTD), while DFAC has returned 15.27%. That puts DFAC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PWS or DFAC?
Year-to-date, the PWS ETF saw -$6M in flows, compared to +$2.90B for DFAC.
Which ETF is more volatile: PWS or DFAC?
Over the past year, PWS had a volatility of 11.43%, while DFAC experienced 12.45%.
Which ETF is bigger: PWS or DFAC?
As of September 1, 2026, PWS holds $24.95 M in assets under management (AUM), while DFAC manages $49.14 B.
What sectors do the PWS and DFAC ETFs invest in?
PWS leans toward sectors like Finance, Technology and Healthcare. Meanwhile, DFAC focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the PWS ETF and DFAC ETF?
PWS top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Chevron Corp.. DFAC holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc. and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: PWS or DFAC?
PWS holds 352 securities with 31.64% of its assets in the top 15. DFAC has 2543 securities and a top 15 weight of 29.98%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PWS & DFAC
Active ETFs See Strong Interest with Managers like Dimensional Fund Advisors Leading the Way
September 14, 2023
DFAC
The Most Popular Actively Managed ETFs of 2023
July 6, 2023
DFAC
Active ETFs gaining prominence
October 11, 2022
DFAC
Advertisement
Advertisement
