PWBvsJGROETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. PWB's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. In contrast, JGRO's top sector exposures are Technology, Healthcare and Industrials. PWB is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.55%, versus 0.44% for JGRO. PWB is up 16.11% year-to-date (YTD) with +$864M in YTD flows. JGRO performs worse with -2.31% YTD performance, and +$1.18B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PWB and JGRO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PWB vs JGRO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/03/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PWB JGRO | -11.32%-8.02% | -5.04%-2.92% | +16.11%-2.31% | +12.80%-5.93% | +110.50%+65.45% | +85.49%n/a |
| Flows | PWB JGRO | +$28M+$7M | +$288M+$20M | +$864M+$1.18B | +$870M+$1.81B | +$1.09B+$7.55B | +$998M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PWB JGRO | +24.25%+17.19% | +25.43%+18.76% | +21.62%+19.86% | +22.45%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PWB JGRO | -13.29%-9.34% | -13.90%-15.38% | -22.20%-22.81% | -31.51%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PWB JGRO | 28d28d | 126d183d | 101d154d | 757dn/a |
Trading data
PWB | JGRO | |
Last sale 11/4/2026 at 2:30 PM | $144.82 | $91.01 |
| Previous close 11/03/2026 | $147.60 | $90.59 |
| Consolidated volume 11/03/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
JGRO
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPWB | JGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/4/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
PWB | JGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $144.82 | $91.01 |
| 1D performance | -1.88% | +0.46% |
| AuM | $2.49 B | $9.48 B |
| E/R | 0.55% | 0.44% |
Characteristics
PWB | JGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 50 | 133 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | March 3, 2005 | August 8, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PWB
USA
95.57%
Other
4.43%
JGRO
USA
97.95%
Other
2.05%
Sectors
PWB
Technology
55.97%
Industrials
19.59%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
9.94%
Other
14.49%
JGRO
Technology
62.46%
Healthcare
10.63%
Industrials
8.03%
Other
18.88%
Advertisement
Diversification
PWB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
51.13%
JGRO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
58.84%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of September 30, 2026
PWB
Intel Corp.
4.26%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
4.08%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
4.03%
Micron Technology, Inc.
3.63%
Apple, Inc.
3.51%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.45%
Applied Materials, Inc.
3.26%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.25%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.18%
Broadcom Inc.
3.15%
Costco Wholesale Corp.
3.09%
Eli Lilly & Co.
3.09%
Visa, Inc.
3.08%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.05%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.03%
JGRO
NVIDIA Corp.
13.08%
Alphabet, Inc.
10.63%
Apple, Inc.
6.04%
Broadcom Inc.
4.28%
Microsoft Corp.
3.79%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.38%
Micron Technology, Inc.
2.85%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.81%
Eli Lilly & Co.
2.44%
Natera, Inc.
1.73%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.69%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
1.68%
Tesla, Inc.
1.59%
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.
1.52%
Philip Morris International, Inc.
1.33%
Frequently asked questions about PWB and JGRO
How have the PWB and JGRO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 3, 2026, PWB is up 16.11% year-to-date (YTD), while JGRO has lost -2.31%. That puts PWB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PWB or JGRO?
Year-to-date, the PWB ETF saw +$864M in flows, compared to +$1.18B for JGRO.
Which ETF is more volatile: PWB or JGRO?
Over the past year, PWB had a volatility of 25.43%, while JGRO experienced 18.76%.
Which ETF is bigger: PWB or JGRO?
As of November 3, 2026, PWB holds $2.49 B in assets under management (AUM), while JGRO manages $9.48 B.
What sectors do the PWB and JGRO ETFs invest in?
PWB leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Consumer Non-Cyclicals. Meanwhile, JGRO focuses on Technology, Healthcare and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the PWB ETF and JGRO ETF?
PWB top holdings include Intel Corp., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. JGRO holds in its top three: NVIDIA Corp., Alphabet, Inc. and Apple, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PWB or JGRO?
PWB holds 50 securities with 51.13% of its assets in the top 15. JGRO has 133 securities and a top 15 weight of 58.84%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PWB & JGRO
Equity Investing 101: Understanding U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFs
December 6, 2023
JGRO
U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETFs to Watch
April 17, 2023
JGRO
Advertisement
Advertisement
