Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PTNQvsQQQIETF Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is part of the Options Strategies segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. PTNQ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.68% for QQQI. PTNQ is down -2.89% year-to-date (YTD) with -$39M in YTD flows. QQQI performs better with -1.64% YTD performance, and +$1.97B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PTNQ and QQQI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PTNQ vs QQQI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PTNQ QQQI | -0.59%-0.09% | -2.69%-1.13% | -2.89%-1.64% | +7.80%+22.47% | +60.36%n/a | +53.96%n/a |
| Flows | PTNQ QQQI | -$12M+$755M | -$24M+$2.62B | -$39M+$1.97B | -$154M+$8.15B | +$122M- | +$44M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PTNQ QQQI | +15.96%+13.91% | +14.72%+19.77% | +12.42%n/a | +12.58%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PTNQ QQQI | -5.69%-4.52% | -9.84%-14.69% | -14.19%n/a | -18.23%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PTNQ QQQI | 43d43d | 120d45d | 210dn/a | 550dn/a |
PTNQ | QQQI | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $75.93 | $51.47 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $76.37 | $51.74 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PTNQ | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PTNQ | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $75.93 | $51.47 |
| 1D performance | -0.56% | -0.52% |
| AuM | $1.21 B | $9.05 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.68% |
PTNQ | QQQI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 93 | 93 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 11, 2015 | January 30, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PTNQ and QQQI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, PTNQ is down -2.89% year-to-date (YTD), while QQQI has lost -1.64%. That puts QQQI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PTNQ or QQQI?
Year-to-date, the PTNQ ETF saw -$39M in flows, compared to +$1.97B for QQQI.
Which ETF is more volatile: PTNQ or QQQI?
Over the past year, PTNQ had a volatility of 14.72%, while QQQI experienced 19.77%.
Which ETF is bigger: PTNQ or QQQI?
As of March 12, 2026, PTNQ holds $1.21 B in assets under management (AUM), while QQQI manages $9.05 B.
What sectors do the PTNQ and QQQI ETFs invest in?
PTNQ leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, QQQI focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the PTNQ ETF and QQQI ETF?
PTNQ top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. QQQI holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: PTNQ or QQQI?
PTNQ holds 100 securities with 58.45% of its assets in the top 15. QQQI has 100 securities and a top 15 weight of 59.61%.
ETF Comparison: JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) Versus NEOS Nasdaq 100 High Income ETF (QQQI)
Multi-Asset Class ETFs – minimize the stress of asset allocation
Have you tried our ETF Compare tool?
Compare ETFs like a pro. Analyze fees, performance, exposure & holdings side-by-side.