PTMCvsCSHIETF Comparison
VS
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. PTMC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. PTMC is up 11.41% year-to-date (YTD) with -$55M in YTD flows. CSHI performs worse with 4% YTD performance, and +$1.31B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PTMC and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PTMC vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PTMC CSHI | +1.76%+0.34% | -2.61%+1.04% | +11.41%+4.00% | +14.44%+4.83% | +35.99%+16.64% | +14.71%n/a |
| Flows | PTMC CSHI | -$4M+$221M | -$12M+$585M | -$55M+$1.31B | -$74M+$1.43B | -$92M+$1.91B | -$130M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PTMC CSHI | +12.10%+0.23% | +14.91%+0.52% | +14.42%+1.09% | +13.43%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PTMC CSHI | -8.30%n/a | -8.87%-0.18% | -15.12%-1.52% | -16.92%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PTMC CSHI | 75dn/a | 53d6d | 507d20d | 862dn/a |
Trading data
PTMC | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $39.74 | $49.70 |
| Previous close 10/29/2026 | $40.22 | $49.70 |
| Consolidated volume 10/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSHI
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPTMC | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PTMC | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $39.74 | $49.70 |
| 1D performance | -1.20% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $369.84 M | $2.12 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
PTMC | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 11, 2015 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PTMC
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
PTMC
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
PTMC
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
PTMC
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about PTMC and CSHI
How have the PTMC and CSHI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 30, 2026, PTMC is up 11.41% year-to-date (YTD), while CSHI has returned 4%. That puts PTMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PTMC or CSHI?
Year-to-date, the PTMC ETF saw -$55M in flows, compared to +$1.31B for CSHI.
Which ETF is more volatile: PTMC or CSHI?
Over the past year, PTMC had a volatility of 14.91%, while CSHI experienced 0.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: PTMC or CSHI?
As of October 30, 2026, PTMC holds $369.84 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSHI manages $2.12 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about PTMC & CSHI
Advertisement
Advertisement
