PTLCvsCSHIETF Comparison
VS
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. PTLC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. PTLC is up 7.67% year-to-date (YTD) with -$290M in YTD flows. CSHI performs worse with 4.12% YTD performance, and +$1.34B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PTLC and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PTLC vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 11/04/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PTLC CSHI | -1.04%+0.38% | -0.46%+1.08% | +7.67%+4.12% | +8.97%+4.90% | +53.70%+16.53% | +53.12%n/a |
| Flows | PTLC CSHI | -$45M+$212M | -$66M+$588M | -$290M+$1.34B | -$388M+$1.44B | -$74M+$1.93B | +$134M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PTLC CSHI | +10.27%+0.26% | +12.28%+0.53% | +12.26%+1.09% | +12.01%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PTLC CSHI | -3.50%-0.04% | -8.81%-0.18% | -15.08%-1.52% | -15.08%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PTLC CSHI | 29d4d | 98d6d | 247d20d | 247dn/a |
Trading data
PTLC | CSHI | |
Last sale 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM | $57.28 | $49.57 |
| Previous close 11/04/2026 | $59.85 | $49.73 |
| Consolidated volume 11/04/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSHI
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPTLC | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 11/5/2026 at 2:30 PM
Live
Closed
PTLC | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $57.28 | $49.57 |
| 1D performance | -4.29% | -0.32% |
| AuM | $3.28 B | $2.14 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
PTLC | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 11, 2015 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PTLC
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
PTLC
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
PTLC
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
PTLC
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about PTLC and CSHI
How have the PTLC and CSHI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of November 4, 2026, PTLC is up 7.67% year-to-date (YTD), while CSHI has returned 4.12%. That puts PTLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PTLC or CSHI?
Year-to-date, the PTLC ETF saw -$290M in flows, compared to +$1.34B for CSHI.
Which ETF is more volatile: PTLC or CSHI?
Over the past year, PTLC had a volatility of 12.28%, while CSHI experienced 0.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: PTLC or CSHI?
As of November 4, 2026, PTLC holds $3.28 B in assets under management (AUM), while CSHI manages $2.14 B.
Latest news about PTLC & CSHI
Advertisement
