PTINvsCSHIETF Comparison
VS
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. PTIN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.67%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. PTIN is up 12.02% year-to-date (YTD) with -$7M in YTD flows. CSHI performs worse with 3.94% YTD performance, and +$1.28B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PTIN and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PTIN vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/23/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PTIN CSHI | -4.02%+0.37% | -1.87%+1.10% | +12.02%+3.94% | +17.01%+4.88% | +52.01%+16.77% | +33.34%n/a |
| Flows | PTIN CSHI | -+$212M | -$4M+$575M | -$7M+$1.28B | -$14M+$1.41B | -$12M+$1.89B | +$2M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PTIN CSHI | +11.26%+0.22% | +14.85%+0.52% | +13.14%+1.10% | +12.15%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PTIN CSHI | -6.37%n/a | -11.16%-0.18% | -13.61%-1.52% | -17.67%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PTIN CSHI | 45dn/a | 65d6d | 177d20d | 848dn/a |
Trading data
PTIN | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.64 | $49.66 |
| Previous close 10/23/2026 | $35.45 | $49.65 |
| Consolidated volume 10/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSHI
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPTIN | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/26/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PTIN | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.64 | $49.66 |
| 1D performance | +0.53% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $174.37 M | $2.09 B |
| E/R | 0.67% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
PTIN | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Pacer Trendpilot International Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 2, 2019 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PTIN
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
PTIN
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
PTIN
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
PTIN
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about PTIN and CSHI
How have the PTIN and CSHI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 23, 2026, PTIN is up 12.02% year-to-date (YTD), while CSHI has returned 3.94%. That puts PTIN better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PTIN or CSHI?
Year-to-date, the PTIN ETF saw -$7M in flows, compared to +$1.28B for CSHI.
Which ETF is more volatile: PTIN or CSHI?
Over the past year, PTIN had a volatility of 14.85%, while CSHI experienced 0.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: PTIN or CSHI?
As of October 23, 2026, PTIN holds $174.37 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSHI manages $2.09 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about PTIN & CSHI
Advertisement
Advertisement
