PRFZvsGSCETF Comparison
VS
Invesco RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid ETF (PRFZ) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Goldman Sachs Small Cap Core Equity ETF (GSC) is part of the US Small Cap segment. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Finance, Healthcare and Technology. PRFZ is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.36%, versus 0.8% for GSC. PRFZ is up 16.2% year-to-date (YTD) with -$256M in YTD flows. GSC performs worse with 14.61% YTD performance, and +$100M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PRFZ and GSC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PRFZ vs GSC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PRFZ GSC | -6.18%-9.57% | +0.07%-5.47% | +16.20%+14.61% | +17.99%+16.30% | +61.36%n/a | +54.04%n/a |
| Flows | PRFZ GSC | +$2M+$1M | -$40M+$8M | -$256M+$100M | -$273M+$101M | -$407M- | -$234M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PRFZ GSC | +14.13%+16.16% | +17.45%+19.73% | +20.29%n/a | +21.14%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PRFZ GSC | -6.52%-10.10% | -10.44%-12.69% | -26.51%n/a | -26.51%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PRFZ GSC | 30d77d | 84d65d | 283dn/a | 283dn/a |
Trading data
PRFZ | GSC | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 6:36 PM | $53.09 | $61.66 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $53.15 | $62.30 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
GSC
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPRFZ | GSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 6:36 PM
Live
Closed
PRFZ | GSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $53.09 | $61.66 |
| 1D performance | -0.11% | -1.03% |
| AuM | $2.73 B | $274.03 M |
| E/R | 0.36% | 0.8% |
Characteristics
PRFZ | GSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1500 Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 1499 | 90 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 20, 2006 | October 5, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PRFZ
USA
97.66%
Other
2.34%
GSC
USA
88.8%
Other
11.2%
Sectors
PRFZ
Finance
23.63%
Healthcare
17.84%
Technology
16.07%
Industrials
10.34%
Other
32.12%
GSC
Finance
23.71%
Healthcare
17.63%
Technology
16.88%
Industrials
10.37%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.34%
Other
24.08%
Advertisement
Diversification
PRFZ
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
5.25%
GSC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
23.17%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PRFZ
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
0.44%
Roivant Sciences Ltd.
0.40%
ATI, Inc.
0.40%
Revolution Medicines, Inc.
0.39%
Iridium Communications, Inc.
0.36%
SharkNinja, Inc.
0.34%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.34%
Enova International, Inc.
0.34%
Bio-Techne Corp.
0.34%
Crescent Energy Co.
0.32%
10X Genomics, Inc.
0.32%
TTM Technologies, Inc.
0.31%
The GEO Group, Inc.
0.31%
UMB Financial Corp.
0.30%
Compass, Inc. (New York)
0.30%
GSC
Terex Corp.
1.82%
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
1.69%
Piper Sandler Cos.
1.68%
Terreno Realty Corp.
1.66%
Alkermes Plc
1.60%
Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, Inc.
1.55%
Standex International Corp.
1.51%
Renasant Corp.
1.50%
ESCO Technologies, Inc.
1.50%
Glaukos Corp.
1.48%
Valley National Bancorp
1.48%
Glacier Bancorp, Inc.
1.44%
ArcBest Corp.
1.44%
10X Genomics, Inc.
1.43%
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
1.40%
Frequently asked questions about PRFZ and GSC
How have the PRFZ and GSC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, PRFZ is up 16.2% year-to-date (YTD), while GSC has returned 14.61%. That puts PRFZ better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PRFZ or GSC?
Year-to-date, the PRFZ ETF saw -$256M in flows, compared to +$100M for GSC.
Which ETF is more volatile: PRFZ or GSC?
Over the past year, PRFZ had a volatility of 17.45%, while GSC experienced 19.73%.
Which ETF is bigger: PRFZ or GSC?
As of September 15, 2026, PRFZ holds $2.73 B in assets under management (AUM), while GSC manages $274.03 M.
What sectors do the PRFZ and GSC ETFs invest in?
PRFZ leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, GSC focuses on Finance, Healthcare and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the PRFZ ETF and GSC ETF?
PRFZ top holdings include Par Pacific Holdings, Inc., Roivant Sciences Ltd. and ATI, Inc.. GSC holds in its top three: Terex Corp., Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. and Piper Sandler Cos..
Which ETF is more diversified: PRFZ or GSC?
PRFZ holds 1500 securities with 5.25% of its assets in the top 15. GSC has 90 securities and a top 15 weight of 23.17%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PRFZ & GSC
Advertisement
