PRCSvsFQALETF Comparison
VS
Parnassus Core Select ETF (PRCS) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. PRCS's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, FQAL's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Healthcare. PRCS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.15% for FQAL. PRCS is up 8.46% year-to-date (YTD) with +$70M in YTD flows. FQAL performs better with 12.37% YTD performance, and +$135M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PRCS and FQAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PRCS vs FQAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PRCS FQAL | -0.82%+1.77% | +4.66%+3.72% | +8.46%+12.37% | +13.11%+18.50% | n/a+69.42% | n/a+71.36% |
| Flows | PRCS FQAL | +$1M-$9M | +$15M-$25M | +$70M+$135M | +$107M+$150M | -+$620M | -+$688M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PRCS FQAL | +14.16%+10.70% | +13.34%+11.36% | n/a+13.95% | n/a+16.30% |
| Max drawdown | PRCS FQAL | -3.70%-3.20% | -12.61%-8.44% | n/a-16.70% | n/a-25.39% |
| Max drawdown duration | PRCS FQAL | 15d8d | 94d50d | n/a126d | n/a750d |
Trading data
PRCS | FQAL | |
Last sale 9/2/2026 at 7:06 PM | $29.09 | $84.36 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $28.95 | $83.97 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PRCS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPRCS | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/2/2026 at 7:06 PM
Live
Closed
PRCS | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.09 | $84.36 |
| 1D performance | +0.49% | +0.46% |
| AuM | $179.46 M | $1.44 B |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.15% |
Characteristics
PRCS | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Parnassus Investments | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity U.S. Quality Factor Index |
| N° of holdings | 26 | 123 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 12, 2024 | September 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PRCS
USA
96.59%
Other
3.41%
FQAL
USA
97.84%
Other
2.16%
Sectors
PRCS
Technology
40.92%
Industrials
12.16%
Finance
11.09%
Healthcare
9.69%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.03%
Other
19.11%
FQAL
Technology
42.49%
Finance
13.54%
Healthcare
9.52%
Industrials
7.72%
Other
26.74%
Advertisement
Diversification
PRCS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.28%
FQAL
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
44.26%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PRCS
Microsoft Corp.
10.17%
Alphabet, Inc.
8.40%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.18%
Amazon.com, Inc.
7.03%
Danaher Corp.
5.19%
Applied Materials, Inc.
4.59%
Waste Management, Inc.
4.37%
Deere & Co.
4.02%
Apple, Inc.
3.70%
Mastercard, Inc.
3.33%
DoorDash, Inc.
3.29%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.09%
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
3.03%
S&P Global, Inc.
2.96%
Linde Plc
2.94%
FQAL
Apple, Inc.
7.97%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.57%
Alphabet, Inc.
5.25%
Microsoft Corp.
4.77%
Broadcom Inc.
3.29%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.03%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.02%
Eli Lilly & Co.
1.88%
Visa, Inc.
1.49%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.46%
Applied Materials, Inc.
1.44%
Johnson & Johnson
1.42%
Seagate Technology Holdings Plc
1.24%
Lam Research Corp.
1.21%
The Home Depot, Inc.
1.21%
Frequently asked questions about PRCS and FQAL
How have the PRCS and FQAL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, PRCS is up 8.46% year-to-date (YTD), while FQAL has returned 12.37%. That puts FQAL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PRCS or FQAL?
Year-to-date, the PRCS ETF saw +$70M in flows, compared to +$135M for FQAL.
Which ETF is more volatile: PRCS or FQAL?
Over the past year, PRCS had a volatility of 13.34%, while FQAL experienced 11.36%.
Which ETF is bigger: PRCS or FQAL?
As of September 2, 2026, PRCS holds $179.46 M in assets under management (AUM), while FQAL manages $1.44 B.
What sectors do the PRCS and FQAL ETFs invest in?
PRCS leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, FQAL focuses on Technology, Finance and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the PRCS ETF and FQAL ETF?
PRCS top holdings include Microsoft Corp., Alphabet, Inc. and NVIDIA Corp.. FQAL holds in its top three: Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp. and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PRCS or FQAL?
PRCS holds 26 securities with 73.28% of its assets in the top 15. FQAL has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 44.26%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PRCS & FQAL
Parnassus Investments Expands Into ETFs: PRCS and PRVS
December 17, 2024
PRCS
Seek unique sources of excess return with Factor-Based ETFs
June 15, 2022
FQAL
Advertisement
Advertisement
