POWvsIGFETF Comparison
VS
VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. POW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Technology. In contrast, IGF's top sector exposures are Utilities, Industrials and Energy. POW is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.39% for IGF. POW is up 36.73% year-to-date (YTD) with +$59M in YTD flows. IGF performs worse with 11.2% YTD performance, and +$1.23B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of POW and IGF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
POW vs IGF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | POW IGF | -10.57%+1.11% | -9.31%+1.06% | +36.73%+11.20% | n/a+17.25% | n/a+55.78% | n/a+70.74% |
| Flows | POW IGF | +$1M+$26M | +$40M+$642M | +$59M+$1.23B | -+$2.29B | -+$4.92B | -+$5.61B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | POW IGF | +33.32%+12.27% | n/a+10.11% | n/a+12.00% | n/a+13.31% |
| Max drawdown | POW IGF | -19.74%-4.06% | n/a-5.86% | n/a-14.01% | n/a-20.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | POW IGF | 74d56d | n/a145d | n/a149d | n/a747d |
Trading data
POW | IGF | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.43 | |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $67.28 | |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
POW
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPOW | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
POW | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $67.43 |
| 1D performance | – | +0.22% |
| AuM | $61.19 M | $11.03 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.39% |
Characteristics
POW | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | VistaShares | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | S&P Global Infrastructure Index |
| N° of holdings | 56 | 76 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 27, 2025 | December 10, 2007 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
POW
USA
53.01%
Republic of Korea
9.95%
Other
37.04%
IGF
USA
36.51%
Australia
9.42%
Spain
9.26%
Canada
8.05%
Mexico
7.3%
Other
29.45%
Sectors
POW
Industrials
57.71%
Utilities
24.21%
Technology
17.72%
Other
0.36%
IGF
Utilities
39.9%
Industrials
39.85%
Energy
19.45%
Other
0.8%
Advertisement
Diversification
POW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
55.3%
IGF
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.25%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
POW
Quanta Services, Inc.
4.96%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
4.92%
Powell Industries, Inc.
4.79%
Prysmian SpA
4.33%
Hyosung Heavy Industries Corp.
4.11%
Eaton Corp. Plc
4.03%
Bel Fuse, Inc.
3.86%
nVent Electric Plc
3.78%
LS Electric Co., Ltd.
3.62%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.27%
Hubbell, Inc.
2.97%
Siemens Energy AG
2.80%
American Electric Power Co., Inc.
2.77%
Hammond Power Solutions, Inc.
2.67%
Sungrow Power Supply Co., Ltd.
2.42%
IGF
Aena S.M.E. SA
5.10%
Transurban Group Ltd.
5.03%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
4.79%
Iberdrola SA
4.16%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.97%
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico SAB de CV
3.89%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
3.05%
Auckland International Airport Ltd.
3.03%
The Southern Co.
2.82%
Duke Energy Corp.
2.64%
Getlink SE
2.51%
Enel SpA
2.38%
Qube Holdings Ltd.
2.36%
TC Energy Corp.
2.31%
Flughafen Zürich AG
2.22%
Frequently asked questions about POW and IGF
How have the POW and IGF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, POW is up 36.73% year-to-date (YTD), while IGF has returned 11.2%. That puts POW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: POW or IGF?
Year-to-date, the POW ETF saw +$59M in flows, compared to +$1.23B for IGF.
Which ETF is bigger: POW or IGF?
As of July 24, 2026, POW holds $61.19 M in assets under management (AUM), while IGF manages $11.03 B.
What sectors do the POW and IGF ETFs invest in?
POW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Technology. Meanwhile, IGF focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the POW ETF and IGF ETF?
POW top holdings include Quanta Services, Inc., Delta Electronics, Inc. and Powell Industries, Inc.. IGF holds in its top three: Aena S.M.E. SA, Transurban Group Ltd. and NextEra Energy, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: POW or IGF?
POW holds 56 securities with 55.3% of its assets in the top 15. IGF has 77 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.25%.
Advertisement
Latest news about POW & IGF
ETF Picks for Every Part of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Value Chain
November 12, 2025
POW
Moving Beyond the 60/40 Convention
January 12, 2023
Advertisement
Advertisement
