POCTvsJEPQETF Comparison
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - October
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - October (POCT) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. POCT is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.35% for JEPQ. POCT is up 9.19% year-to-date (YTD) with -$133M in YTD flows. JEPQ performs better with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$10.33B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of POCT and JEPQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
POCT vs JEPQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | POCT JEPQ | +1.05%+0.51% | +2.72%+2.60% | +9.19%+10.72% | +11.96%+15.71% | +39.67%+71.07% | +60.98%n/a |
| Flows | POCT JEPQ | +$122M+$1.45B | +$83M+$3.86B | -$133M+$10.33B | -$61M+$11.72B | +$212M+$33.68B | +$501M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | POCT JEPQ | +4.04%+13.96% | +5.85%+14.95% | +7.31%+15.77% | +8.21%n/a |
| Max drawdown | POCT JEPQ | -1.00%-5.97% | -4.50%-8.85% | -10.18%-20.17% | -10.18%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | POCT JEPQ | 3d13d | 44d76d | 107d169d | 107dn/a |
POCT | JEPQ | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $47.99 | $58.81 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $48.29 | $60.10 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
POCT | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $47.99 | $58.81 |
| 1D performance | -0.62% | -2.15% |
| AuM | $1.08 B | $43.34 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.35% |
POCT | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 1, 2018 | May 3, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
