Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PIPEvsIGFETF Comparison
Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) belong to the same industry segment: Infrastructure. PIPE's top 3 sector exposures are Energy and Utilities. In contrast, IGF's top sector exposures are Utilities and Industrials.Energy, PIPE is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.39% for IGF. PIPE is up 19.48% year-to-date (YTD) with -$209K in YTD flows. IGF performs worse with 8.22% YTD performance, and +$290M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PIPE and IGF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PIPE vs IGF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PIPE IGF | +5.41%-1.34% | +19.66%+8.90% | +19.48%+8.22% | +23.44%+30.21% | n/a+58.58% | n/a+71.00% |
| Flows | PIPE IGF | +$1M+$177M | -$209K+$443M | -$209K+$290M | +$41M+$2.40B | -+$3.99B | -+$4.62B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PIPE IGF | +14.13%+9.90% | +18.60%+11.90% | n/a+11.89% | n/a+13.21% |
| Max drawdown | PIPE IGF | -3.30%-4.11% | -15.66%-8.54% | n/a-14.82% | n/a-20.74% |
| Max drawdown duration | PIPE IGF | 9d11d | 294d14d | n/a321d | n/a747d |
PIPE | IGF | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $28.92 | $66.50 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $28.83 | $66.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PIPE | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PIPE | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $28.92 | $66.50 |
| 1D performance | +0.32% | -0.14% |
| AuM | $60.43 M | $9.96 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.39% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PIPE and IGF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, PIPE is up 19.48% year-to-date (YTD), while IGF has returned 8.22%. That puts PIPE better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PIPE or IGF?
Year-to-date, the PIPE ETF saw -$209K in flows, compared to +$290M for IGF.
Which ETF is more volatile: PIPE or IGF?
Over the past year, PIPE had a volatility of 18.6%, while IGF experienced 11.9%.
Which ETF is bigger: PIPE or IGF?
As of March 12, 2026, PIPE holds $60.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while IGF manages $9.96 B.
What sectors do the PIPE and IGF ETFs invest in?
PIPE leans toward sectors like Energy. Meanwhile, IGF focuses on Utilities, Industrials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the PIPE ETF and IGF ETF?
PIPE top holdings include TARGA RESOURCS, WILLIAMS and TC ENERGY CORP. IGF holds in its top three: NEXTERA ENERGY, ES0105046017 and TRANSURBAN GRP REIT.
Which ETF is more diversified: PIPE or IGF?
PIPE holds 25 securities with 75.45% of its assets in the top 15. IGF has 78 securities and a top 15 weight of 50.22%.
Notable ETF Filings and Launches Recap: February 2025
Moving Beyond the 60/40 Convention
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
