Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PHOvsBKMCETF Comparison
Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belongs to the Natural Resources segment. BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. PHO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Information Technology and Utilities. In contrast, BKMC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Information Technology. PHO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.04% for BKMC. PHO is down -2.69% year-to-date (YTD) with -$13M in YTD flows. BKMC performs better with 3.69% YTD performance, and -$40M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PHO and BKMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PHO vs BKMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PHO BKMC | -6.81%-4.65% | -4.75%+2.07% | -2.69%+3.69% | +5.67%+20.28% | +36.29%+50.47% | +44.19%+46.66% |
| Flows | PHO BKMC | -$31K-$26M | -$14M-$33M | -$13M-$40M | -$197M+$24M | -$256M+$46M | -$7M+$401M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PHO BKMC | +15.44%+15.08% | +18.45%+21.00% | +16.22%+17.61% | +18.14%+19.15% |
| Max drawdown | PHO BKMC | -8.11%-5.01% | -11.61%-15.35% | -19.26%-23.71% | -28.58%-25.02% |
| Max drawdown duration | PHO BKMC | 48d12d | 43d46d | 250d284d | 715d827d |
PHO | BKMC | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $67.15 | $110.51 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $68.46 | $112.59 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PHO | BKMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PHO | BKMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $67.15 | $110.51 |
| 1D performance | -1.91% | -1.85% |
| AuM | $2.02 B | $595.04 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.04% |
PHO | BKMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | BNY Mellon |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ OMX US Water Index | Solactive GBS United States 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | 34 | 349 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 6, 2005 | April 7, 2020 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PHO and BKMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, PHO is down -2.69% year-to-date (YTD), while BKMC has returned 3.69%. That puts BKMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PHO or BKMC?
Year-to-date, the PHO ETF saw -$13M in flows, compared to -$40M for BKMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: PHO or BKMC?
Over the past year, PHO had a volatility of 18.45%, while BKMC experienced 21%.
Which ETF is bigger: PHO or BKMC?
As of March 11, 2026, PHO holds $2.02 B in assets under management (AUM), while BKMC manages $595.04 M.
What sectors do the PHO and BKMC ETFs invest in?
PHO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Information Technology and Utilities. Meanwhile, BKMC focuses on Industrials, Financials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the PHO ETF and BKMC ETF?
PHO top holdings include ECOLAB, US31488V1070 and WATERS. BKMC holds in its top three: US80004C2008, KYG3730V1059 and BLOOM ENERGY CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: PHO or BKMC?
PHO holds 36 securities with 76.33% of its assets in the top 15. BKMC has 396 securities and a top 15 weight of 9.73%.
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
