PHOvsBKMCETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Water Resources ETF (PHO) belongs to the Natural Resources segment. BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF (BKMC) is part of the US Mid Cap segment. PHO's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. In contrast, BKMC's top sector exposures are Industrials, Health Care and Financials. PHO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.04% for BKMC. PHO is down -1.32% year-to-date (YTD) with +$45M in YTD flows. BKMC performs better with 8.19% YTD performance, and -$28M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PHO and BKMC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PHO vs BKMC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PHO BKMC | +5.84%+6.77% | -5.13%+1.35% | -1.32%+8.19% | +8.40%+28.20% | +34.70%+52.32% | +35.51%+43.00% |
| Flows | PHO BKMC | +$45M+$11M | +$53M-$21M | +$45M-$28M | -$82M+$188M | -$175M+$46M | -$9M+$404M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PHO BKMC | +16.42%+17.62% | +15.37%+15.65% | +16.15%+17.63% | +18.22%+19.25% |
| Max drawdown | PHO BKMC | -11.58%-9.70% | -11.99%-9.70% | -19.26%-23.71% | -28.58%-25.02% |
| Max drawdown duration | PHO BKMC | 78d49d | 188d49d | 250d284d | 715d827d |
Trading data
PHO | BKMC | |
Last sale 4/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $69.34 | $117.18 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $69.34 | $117.22 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PHO | BKMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PHO | BKMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $69.34 | $117.18 |
| 1D performance | +0.00% | -0.04% |
| AuM | $2.11 B | $620.25 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.04% |
Characteristics
PHO | BKMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | BNY Mellon |
| Benchmark | NASDAQ OMX US Water Index | Solactive GBS United States 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | 34 | 349 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 6, 2005 | April 7, 2020 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PHO
USA
94.98%
Other
5.02%
BKMC
USA
92.2%
Other
7.8%
Sectors
PHO
Industrials
42.81%
Utilities
14.14%
Information Techn.
13.87%
Materials
8.45%
Health Care
8.03%
Other
12.7%
BKMC
Industrials
21.6%
Health Care
11.38%
Financials
11.23%
Information Techn.
10.51%
Consumer Discreti.
9.98%
Real Estate
7.49%
Other
27.82%
Advertisement
Diversification
PHO
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
76.72%
BKMC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
8.92%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
PHO
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC
8.73%
WATERS
8.03%
AMERICAN WATER WORKS
7.77%
US31488V1070
7.64%
ECOLAB
7.52%
XYLEM
4.02%
IDEX
3.95%
CORE & MAIN
3.94%
US92338C1036
3.87%
AECOM
3.87%
PENTAIR PLC
3.80%
ESSENTIAL UTILITIES INC
3.71%
MUELLER INDUSTRIES
3.67%
A O SMITH
3.11%
TETRA TECH
3.10%
BKMC
TECHNIPFMC PLC
0.78%
CASEYS GENERAL STORES
0.72%
CURTISS WRIGHT
0.67%
XPO LOGISTICS
0.61%
WOODWARD
0.59%
UTD THERAPEUT
0.58%
CF INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS
0.57%
ALBEMARLE
0.57%
BURLINGTON STORES
0.57%
FABRINET
0.55%
US FOODS HOLDING CORP
0.55%
CH ROBINSON WW
0.54%
ATI INC
0.54%
MICHAEL STORES
0.54%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY
0.53%
Frequently asked questions about PHO and BKMC
How have the PHO and BKMC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, PHO is down -1.32% year-to-date (YTD), while BKMC has returned 8.19%. That puts BKMC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PHO or BKMC?
Year-to-date, the PHO ETF saw +$45M in flows, compared to -$28M for BKMC.
Which ETF is more volatile: PHO or BKMC?
Over the past year, PHO had a volatility of 15.37%, while BKMC experienced 15.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: PHO or BKMC?
As of April 27, 2026, PHO holds $2.11 B in assets under management (AUM), while BKMC manages $620.25 M.
What sectors do the PHO and BKMC ETFs invest in?
PHO leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Information Technology. Meanwhile, BKMC focuses on Industrials, Health Care and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the PHO ETF and BKMC ETF?
PHO top holdings include ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC, WATERS and AMERICAN WATER WORKS. BKMC holds in its top three: TECHNIPFMC PLC, CASEYS GENERAL STORES and CURTISS WRIGHT.
Which ETF is more diversified: PHO or BKMC?
PHO holds 36 securities with 76.72% of its assets in the top 15. BKMC has 394 securities and a top 15 weight of 8.92%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PHO & BKMC
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Water
January 17, 2024
PHO
3 Water ETFs for Thirsty Investors
February 3, 2023
PHO
Advertisement
Advertisement
