Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PGROvsIWFETF Comparison
Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. PGRO's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, IWF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. PGRO is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.5%, versus 0.18% for IWF. PGRO is down -4.75% year-to-date (YTD) with +$3M in YTD flows. IWF performs better with -4.6% YTD performance, and -$3.40B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PGRO and IWF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PGRO vs IWF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PGRO IWF | -2.26%-1.42% | -6.11%-5.65% | -4.75%-4.60% | +22.04%+24.77% | +102.63%+103.62% | n/a+92.00% |
| Flows | PGRO IWF | +$2M+$648M | +$4M-$2.01B | +$3M-$3.40B | -$10M-$1.57B | +$5M-$469M | --$1.22B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PGRO IWF | +15.87%+15.76% | +22.44%+22.60% | +19.53%+19.04% | n/a+21.41% |
| Max drawdown | PGRO IWF | -7.23%-7.14% | -15.18%-15.75% | -23.23%-23.36% | n/a-32.75% |
| Max drawdown duration | PGRO IWF | 90d76d | 37d45d | 153d191d | n/a743d |
PGRO | IWF | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 7:59 PM | $42.55 | $446.82 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $42.46 | $451.32 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PGRO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PGRO | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $42.55 | $446.82 |
| 1D performance | +0.21% | -1.00% |
| AuM | $64.79 M | $116.99 B |
| E/R | 0.5% | 0.18% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PGRO and IWF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, PGRO is down -4.75% year-to-date (YTD), while IWF has lost -4.6%. That puts IWF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PGRO or IWF?
Year-to-date, the PGRO ETF saw +$3M in flows, compared to -$3.40B for IWF.
Which ETF is more volatile: PGRO or IWF?
Over the past year, PGRO had a volatility of 22.44%, while IWF experienced 22.6%.
Which ETF is bigger: PGRO or IWF?
As of March 11, 2026, PGRO holds $64.79 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWF manages $116.99 B.
What sectors do the PGRO and IWF ETFs invest in?
PGRO leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWF focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the PGRO ETF and IWF ETF?
PGRO top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IWF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: PGRO or IWF?
PGRO holds 34 securities with 75.37% of its assets in the top 15. IWF has 391 securities and a top 15 weight of 66.22%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
