PFLDvsCSHIETF Comparison
ETF 1
PFLD
AAM Low Duration Preferred & Income Securities ETF
This fund is part of
Multi-Asset: Other
-0.26%
VS
AAM Low Duration Preferred & Income Securities ETF (PFLD) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. PFLD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. PFLD is up 1.68% year-to-date (YTD) with -$67M in YTD flows. CSHI performs better with 3.83% YTD performance, and +$1.23B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PFLD and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PFLD vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PFLD CSHI | -0.78%+0.36% | -1.06%+1.06% | +1.68%+3.83% | +2.77%+4.97% | +14.99%+16.74% | +1.64%n/a |
| Flows | PFLD CSHI | -$15M+$186M | -$31M+$570M | -$67M+$1.23B | -$102M+$1.36B | +$214M+$1.84B | +$358M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PFLD CSHI | +1.85%+0.23% | +1.78%+0.53% | +4.30%+1.10% | +6.67%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PFLD CSHI | -1.50%n/a | -1.85%-0.18% | -5.83%-1.52% | -16.11%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PFLD CSHI | 50dn/a | 53d6d | 312d20d | 1536dn/a |
Trading data
PFLD | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $19.09 | $49.61 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $19.14 | $49.59 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of October 20, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSHI
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPFLD | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PFLD | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $19.09 | $49.61 |
| 1D performance | -0.26% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $375.55 M | $2.03 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
PFLD | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Advisors Asset Management | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | ICE 0-5 Year Duration Exchange-Listed Preferred & Hybrid Securities Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Preferred Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 19, 2019 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PFLD
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
PFLD
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
PFLD
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
PFLD
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about PFLD and CSHI
How have the PFLD and CSHI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, PFLD is up 1.68% year-to-date (YTD), while CSHI has returned 3.83%. That puts CSHI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PFLD or CSHI?
Year-to-date, the PFLD ETF saw -$67M in flows, compared to +$1.23B for CSHI.
Which ETF is more volatile: PFLD or CSHI?
Over the past year, PFLD had a volatility of 1.78%, while CSHI experienced 0.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: PFLD or CSHI?
As of October 16, 2026, PFLD holds $375.55 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSHI manages $2.03 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about PFLD & CSHI
Advertisement
Advertisement
