Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PEZvsXRTETF Comparison
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) belong to the same industry segment: US Cons. Discretionary. PEZ's top 3 sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Health Care and Communication Services. In contrast, XRT's top sector exposures are Consumer Discretionary, Consumer Staples and Materials. PEZ is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.78%, versus 0.35% for XRT. PEZ is down -5.34% year-to-date (YTD) with -$2M in YTD flows. XRT performs better with -4.1% YTD performance, and +$45M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PEZ and XRT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PEZ vs XRT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PEZ XRT | -6.44%-6.29% | -7.74%-7.66% | -5.34%-4.10% | +16.13%+19.53% | +50.72%+38.45% | +8.24%-5.14% |
| Flows | PEZ XRT | --$220M | -$1M+$7M | -$2M+$45M | -$37M+$100M | -$11M+$6M | -$58M-$107M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PEZ XRT | +19.95%+17.48% | +24.27%+24.94% | +22.87%+22.60% | +24.89%+27.09% |
| Max drawdown | PEZ XRT | -10.48%-10.02% | -15.68%-13.05% | -31.64%-25.60% | -41.78%-44.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | PEZ XRT | 57d55d | 45d37d | 471d244d | 1008d1576d |
PEZ | XRT | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $95.93 | $80.26 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $98.43 | $81.74 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PEZ | XRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PEZ | XRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $95.93 | $80.26 |
| 1D performance | -2.54% | -1.81% |
| AuM | $23.62 M | $494.86 M |
| E/R | 0.78% | 0.35% |
PEZ | XRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | SPDR |
| Benchmark | Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Consumer Cyclicals Index | S&P Retail Select Industry Index |
| N° of holdings | 40 | 72 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | October 12, 2006 | June 19, 2006 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PEZ and XRT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, PEZ is down -5.34% year-to-date (YTD), while XRT has lost -4.1%. That puts XRT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PEZ or XRT?
Year-to-date, the PEZ ETF saw -$2M in flows, compared to +$45M for XRT.
Which ETF is more volatile: PEZ or XRT?
Over the past year, PEZ had a volatility of 24.27%, while XRT experienced 24.94%.
Which ETF is bigger: PEZ or XRT?
As of March 11, 2026, PEZ holds $23.62 M in assets under management (AUM), while XRT manages $494.86 M.
What sectors do the PEZ and XRT ETFs invest in?
PEZ leans toward sectors like Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, XRT focuses on Consumer Discretionary and Consumer Staples.
What are the top holdings of the PEZ ETF and XRT ETF?
PEZ top holdings include ECHOSTAR, CARVANA CO and TAPESTRY INC. XRT holds in its top three: CAMPING WORLD HOLDINGS, DOLLAR GENERAL and CASEYS GENERAL STORES.
Which ETF is more diversified: PEZ or XRT?
PEZ holds 40 securities with 54.29% of its assets in the top 15. XRT has 73 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.24%.
There's an ETF for That? Black Friday & Cyber Monday Retail
2023 Holiday Outlook: Retail ETFs to Keep on Your Watchlist
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
