PCSvsLQDETF Comparison
VS
PGIM Corporate Bond 0-5 Year ETF (PCS) and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) belong to the same industry segment: Intl IG Bonds. PCS's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Utilities and Industrials. In contrast, LQD's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. PCS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.14% for LQD. PCS is up 0.95% year-to-date (YTD) with +$509M in YTD flows. LQD performs worse with -2.92% YTD performance, and +$794M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PCS and LQD below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PCS vs LQD performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PCS LQD | +0.14%-0.57% | -0.21%-2.62% | +0.95%-2.92% | +1.81%-3.61% | n/a+17.43% | n/a-4.94% |
| Flows | PCS LQD | +$41M+$1.34B | +$64M-$5.16B | +$509M+$794M | +$547M-$659M | --$516M | --$1.31B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PCS LQD | +1.67%+5.83% | +1.54%+5.28% | n/a+6.72% | n/a+8.17% |
| Max drawdown | PCS LQD | -1.21%-4.18% | -1.21%-6.00% | n/a-6.22% | n/a-24.70% |
| Max drawdown duration | PCS LQD | 51d89d | 51d229d | n/a318d | n/a1802d |
Trading data
PCS | LQD | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $49.26 | $103.40 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $49.23 | $103.50 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PCS
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPCS | LQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PCS | LQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $49.26 | $103.40 |
| 1D performance | +0.05% | -0.10% |
| AuM | $674.59 M | $28.78 B |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.14% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PCS
USA
81.47%
Other
18.53%
LQD
USA
85.26%
Other
14.74%
Sectors
PCS
Finance
40.52%
Utilities
9.68%
Industrials
8.94%
Energy
7.53%
Other
33.33%
LQD
Finance
32.42%
Technology
13.63%
Healthcare
10.13%
Energy
7.98%
Telecommunication.
7.88%
Other
27.97%
Advertisement
Diversification
PCS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
20.28%
LQD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
3.21%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
PCS
JP Morgan, 5.581% 22apr2030, USD
2.10%
Bank of America Corporation, 2.087% 14jun2029, USD (N)
1.92%
Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., 5.504% 26may2028, USD (A)
1.65%
Goldman Sachs, 4.369% 21oct2031, USD
1.60%
Citigroup, 4.952% 7may2031, USD
1.55%
USA, Notes 3.875% 31mar2028, USD (AZ-2028)
1.39%
Goldman Sachs, 2.64% 24feb2028, USD
1.30%
Morgan Stanley, 2.699% 22jan2031, USD (I)
1.29%
Philip Morris International, 4.375% 1nov2027, USD
1.19%
Spirit AeroSystems, 4.6% 15jun2028, USD
1.19%
Southern California Edison, 5.3% 1mar2028, USD (2023A)
1.10%
Alexandria Real Estate Equities Inc., 4.9% 15dec2030, USD
1.02%
Wells Fargo, 4.97% 23apr2029, USD (W)
1.01%
Cigna Group, 2.4% 15mar2030, USD
1.01%
JP Morgan, 4.995% 22jul2030, USD
0.98%
LQD
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
1.04%
Anheuser-Busch, 4.9% 1feb2046, USD
0.18%
CVS Health, 5.05% 25mar2048, USD
0.18%
Space Exploration Technologies, 5.35% 15jul2031, USD
0.17%
T-Mobile USA, 3.875% 15apr2030, USD
0.17%
Meta Platforms, 4.875% 15nov2035, USD
0.16%
US161175CU68
0.15%
US161175CV42
0.15%
Amazon.com, 4.875% 13mar2036, USD
0.15%
Goldman Sachs, 6.75% 1oct2037, USD
0.14%
Meta Platforms, 5.25% 15may2036, USD
0.14%
Space Exploration Technologies, 5.65% 15jul2033, USD
0.14%
Pfizer, 5.3% 19may2053, USD
0.14%
Meta Platforms, 6.3% 15may2056, USD
0.14%
Amazon.com, 4.8% 9jul2031, USD
0.14%
Frequently asked questions about PCS and LQD
How have the PCS and LQD ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 15, 2026, PCS is up 0.95% year-to-date (YTD), while LQD has lost -2.92%. That puts PCS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PCS or LQD?
Year-to-date, the PCS ETF saw +$509M in flows, compared to +$794M for LQD.
Which ETF is more volatile: PCS or LQD?
Over the past year, PCS had a volatility of 1.54%, while LQD experienced 5.28%.
Which ETF is bigger: PCS or LQD?
As of October 15, 2026, PCS holds $674.59 M in assets under management (AUM), while LQD manages $28.78 B.
What sectors do the PCS and LQD ETFs invest in?
PCS leans toward sectors like Finance, Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, LQD focuses on Finance, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the PCS ETF and LQD ETF?
PCS top holdings include JP Morgan, 5.581% 22apr2030, USD, Bank of America Corporation, 2.087% 14jun2029, USD (N) and Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A., 5.504% 26may2028, USD (A). LQD holds in its top three: BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury, Anheuser-Busch, 4.9% 1feb2046, USD and CVS Health, 5.05% 25mar2048, USD.
Which ETF is more diversified: PCS or LQD?
PCS holds 297 securities with 20.28% of its assets in the top 15. LQD has 3138 securities and a top 15 weight of 3.21%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PCS & LQD
The Weekly ETF Market Monitor (September 7-11, 2026)
September 14, 2026
LQD
How Well Did CLO ETFs Hold Up During Market Volatility?
October 1, 2025
LQD
Renewed Interest in IG Corporate Bonds as Treasury Yields Fall
October 16, 2023
LQD
What are corporate bond ETFs?
October 26, 2022
LQD
Advertisement
Advertisement
