Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PCLGvsJGRWETF Comparison
Polen Focus Growth ETF (PCLG) and Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. PCLG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, JGRW's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care. PCLG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.69%, versus 0.57% for JGRW. PCLG is down -11.78% year-to-date (YTD) with +$4M in YTD flows. JGRW performs better with -7.3% YTD performance, and +$2M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PCLG and JGRW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PCLG vs JGRW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PCLG JGRW | -0.05%-2.26% | -12.35%-6.85% | -11.78%-7.30% | n/a+1.27% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | PCLG JGRW | -$10M- | +$3M+$8M | +$4M+$2M | -+$30M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PCLG JGRW | +16.65%+11.85% | n/a+15.64% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | PCLG JGRW | -15.05%-8.75% | n/a-10.43% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PCLG JGRW | 58d61d | n/a37d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
PCLG | JGRW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $21.18 | $25.01 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $21.33 | $25.21 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
PCLG | JGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $21.18 | $25.01 |
| 1D performance | -0.73% | -0.79% |
| AuM | $100.74 M | $115.74 M |
| E/R | 0.69% | 0.57% |
PCLG | JGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Polen Capital | Jensen Investment Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 26 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 29, 2025 | August 12, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PCLG and JGRW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, PCLG is down -11.78% year-to-date (YTD), while JGRW has lost -7.3%. That puts JGRW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PCLG or JGRW?
Year-to-date, the PCLG ETF saw +$4M in flows, compared to +$2M for JGRW.
Which ETF is bigger: PCLG or JGRW?
As of March 11, 2026, PCLG holds $100.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while JGRW manages $115.74 M.
What sectors do the PCLG and JGRW ETFs invest in?
PCLG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, JGRW focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the PCLG ETF and JGRW ETF?
PCLG top holdings include AMAZON.COM INC, MICROSOFT-T and LILLY. JGRW holds in its top three: MICROSOFT-T, ALPHABET INC-CL and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: PCLG or JGRW?
PCLG holds 24 securities with 76.11% of its assets in the top 15. JGRW has 26 securities and a top 15 weight of 76.52%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
