PCEFvsCSHIETF Comparison
VS
Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. PCEF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 2.76%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. PCEF is up 3.02% year-to-date (YTD) with -$54M in YTD flows. CSHI performs better with 4% YTD performance, and +$1.28B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PCEF and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PCEF vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PCEF CSHI | +0.26%+0.37% | -1.73%+1.10% | +3.02%+4.00% | +3.68%+4.87% | +54.15%+16.80% | +20.99%n/a |
| Flows | PCEF CSHI | -$24M+$201M | -$26M+$555M | -$54M+$1.28B | -$92M+$1.41B | +$8M+$1.88B | -$24M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PCEF CSHI | +8.98%+0.22% | +9.50%+0.52% | +10.28%+1.10% | +11.25%n/a |
| Max drawdown | PCEF CSHI | -6.12%n/a | -8.38%-0.18% | -14.10%-1.52% | -24.29%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | PCEF CSHI | 75dn/a | 63d6d | 124d20d | 1015dn/a |
Trading data
PCEF | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $19.30 | $49.69 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $19.18 | $49.68 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSHI
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexPCEF | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PCEF | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $19.30 | $49.69 |
| 1D performance | +0.63% | +0.02% |
| AuM | $743.17 M | $2.09 B |
| E/R | 2.76% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
PCEF | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Invesco | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | February 19, 2010 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PCEF
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
PCEF
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Diversification
PCEF
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
PCEF
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about PCEF and CSHI
How have the PCEF and CSHI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, PCEF is up 3.02% year-to-date (YTD), while CSHI has returned 4%. That puts CSHI better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PCEF or CSHI?
Year-to-date, the PCEF ETF saw -$54M in flows, compared to +$1.28B for CSHI.
Which ETF is more volatile: PCEF or CSHI?
Over the past year, PCEF had a volatility of 9.5%, while CSHI experienced 0.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: PCEF or CSHI?
As of October 27, 2026, PCEF holds $743.17 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSHI manages $2.09 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about PCEF & CSHI
Advertisement
Advertisement
