PBWvsURAETF Comparison
VS
Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. PBW's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. In contrast, URA's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. PBW is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.64%, versus 0.69% for URA. PBW is up 4.17% year-to-date (YTD) with -$308M in YTD flows. URA performs worse with -6.62% YTD performance, and +$835M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBW and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PBW vs URA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBW URA | -16.18%-10.92% | -14.27%-27.83% | +4.17%-6.62% | +30.14%-0.34% | -20.53%+109.75% | -56.10%+149.57% |
| Flows | PBW URA | -$49M+$36M | +$16M-$23M | -$308M+$835M | -$94M+$1.86B | -$159M+$2.82B | -$438M+$3.90B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBW URA | +50.57%+44.40% | +42.91%+44.75% | +41.17%+36.36% | +43.29%+37.49% |
| Max drawdown | PBW URA | -32.26%-33.01% | -32.26%-36.85% | -67.97%-36.85% | -84.50%-37.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | PBW URA | 52d79d | 52d177d | 1012d177d | 1719d738d |
Trading data
PBW | URA | |
Last sale 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.66 | $39.89 |
| Previous close 07/23/2026 | $33.22 | $41.13 |
| Consolidated volume 07/23/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PBW | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PBW | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.66 | $39.89 |
| 1D performance | -4.70% | -3.01% |
| AuM | $379.34 M | $5.55 B |
| E/R | 0.64% | 0.69% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PBW
USA
80.33%
Other
19.67%
URA
Canada
42.07%
USA
21.88%
Republic of Korea
13.99%
Australia
9.1%
Other
12.96%
Sectors
PBW
Industrials
48.7%
Non-Energy Materi.
20.84%
Technology
13.52%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.97%
Other
8.97%
URA
Energy
54.35%
Industrials
24.05%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.68%
Other
13.93%
Advertisement
Diversification
PBW
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.83%
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.24%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
PBW
FuelCell Energy, Inc.
4.57%
Hyliion Holdings Corp.
2.98%
Navitas Semiconductor Corp.
2.41%
MYR Group, Inc.
2.23%
Bloom Energy Corp.
2.23%
Aspen Aerogels, Inc.
2.21%
Powell Industries, Inc.
1.92%
IonQ, Inc.
1.85%
Preformed Line Products Co.
1.85%
Shoals Technologies Group, Inc.
1.84%
Bel Fuse, Inc.
1.81%
Ballard Power Systems, Inc.
1.80%
ioneer Ltd.
1.80%
D-Wave Quantum, Inc.
1.73%
First Solar, Inc.
1.61%
URA
Cameco Corp.
24.63%
Oklo, Inc.
6.72%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
6.14%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.32%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
4.81%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.73%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.75%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
3.62%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
3.06%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.98%
Denison Mines Corp.
2.95%
Centrus Energy Corp.
2.87%
Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd.
2.79%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION Co., Ltd.
2.65%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
2.24%
Frequently asked questions about PBW and URA
How have the PBW and URA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 24, 2026, PBW is up 4.17% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has lost -6.62%. That puts PBW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PBW or URA?
Year-to-date, the PBW ETF saw -$308M in flows, compared to +$835M for URA.
Which ETF is more volatile: PBW or URA?
Over the past year, PBW had a volatility of 42.91%, while URA experienced 44.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: PBW or URA?
As of July 24, 2026, PBW holds $379.34 M in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $5.55 B.
What sectors do the PBW and URA ETFs invest in?
PBW leans toward sectors like Industrials, Non-Energy Materials and Technology. Meanwhile, URA focuses on Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the PBW ETF and URA ETF?
PBW top holdings include FuelCell Energy, Inc., Hyliion Holdings Corp. and Navitas Semiconductor Corp.. URA holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Oklo, Inc. and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: PBW or URA?
PBW holds 68 securities with 32.83% of its assets in the top 15. URA has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 79.24%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PBW & URA
Donald Trump vs Kamala Harris: ETFs to Watch
November 1, 2024
PBW
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Energy Sector Plunges for the Third Week in a Row
November 13, 2023
URA
Rising Interest Rates Cast Shadows Over US Alternative Energy ETFs
August 21, 2023
URA
Advertisement
