PBDvsURAETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. PBD's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, URA's top sector exposures are Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials. PBD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.69% for URA. PBD is up 13.82% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. URA performs worse with -9.24% YTD performance, and +$821M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBD and URA below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PBD vs URA performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBD URA | -9.28%-18.53% | -7.29%-29.90% | +13.82%-9.24% | +37.97%+0.98% | -2.41%+102.98% | -28.16%+150.90% |
| Flows | PBD URA | --$4M | +$11M+$29M | +$7M+$821M | +$78M+$1.84B | +$19M+$2.81B | -$71M+$3.86B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBD URA | +29.44%+44.39% | +23.88%+44.61% | +23.99%+36.23% | +26.37%+37.44% |
| Max drawdown | PBD URA | -18.34%-32.36% | -18.34%-36.23% | -52.08%-36.76% | -68.69%-37.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | PBD URA | 45d72d | 45d170d | 996d214d | 1706d738d |
Trading data
PBD | URA | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $18.15 | $38.73 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $18.21 | $39.11 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PBD | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PBD | URA | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $18.15 | $38.73 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | -0.97% |
| AuM | $191.74 M | $5.38 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.69% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PBD
USA
19.36%
Taiwan
12.03%
China
10.62%
Republic of Korea
9.89%
Other
48.1%
URA
Canada
40.26%
USA
23.65%
Republic of Korea
14.42%
Australia
9.2%
Other
12.46%
Sectors
PBD
Industrials
56.88%
Utilities
16.14%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.77%
Technology
8.69%
Other
8.52%
URA
Energy
53.73%
Industrials
24.43%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.77%
Utilities
7.37%
Other
6.69%
Advertisement
Diversification
PBD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.24%
URA
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.96%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
PBD
ITM Power Plc
2.57%
Ballard Power Systems, Inc.
2.21%
Ceres Power Holdings plc
2.07%
Doosan Fuel Cell Co., Ltd.
1.92%
Plug Power, Inc.
1.68%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
1.58%
Bloom Energy Corp.
1.55%
SMA Solar Technology AG
1.51%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.45%
LS Corp.
1.37%
LS Electric Co., Ltd.
1.33%
OY Nofar Energy Ltd.
1.28%
Alfen NV
1.27%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
1.25%
West Holdings Corp.
1.22%
URA
Cameco Corp.
23.18%
Oklo, Inc.
7.37%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
6.32%
Uranium Energy Corp.
5.86%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
4.47%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.33%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
3.92%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
3.32%
Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd.
3.27%
Samsung C&T Corp.
3.05%
HYUNDAI ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION Co., Ltd.
2.97%
Denison Mines Corp.
2.87%
Centrus Energy Corp.
2.83%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.81%
Doosan Enerbility Co., Ltd.
2.38%
Frequently asked questions about PBD and URA
How have the PBD and URA ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, PBD is up 13.82% year-to-date (YTD), while URA has lost -9.24%. That puts PBD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PBD or URA?
Year-to-date, the PBD ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to +$821M for URA.
Which ETF is more volatile: PBD or URA?
Over the past year, PBD had a volatility of 23.88%, while URA experienced 44.61%.
Which ETF is bigger: PBD or URA?
As of July 17, 2026, PBD holds $191.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while URA manages $5.38 B.
What sectors do the PBD and URA ETFs invest in?
PBD leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, URA focuses on Energy, Industrials and Non-Energy Materials.
What are the top holdings of the PBD ETF and URA ETF?
PBD top holdings include ITM Power Plc, Ballard Power Systems, Inc. and Ceres Power Holdings plc. URA holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Oklo, Inc. and NexGen Energy Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: PBD or URA?
PBD holds 110 securities with 24.24% of its assets in the top 15. URA has 49 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.96%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PBD & URA
Global X ETFs Celebrates 15-Year Listing Anniversary on NYSE
March 12, 2024
URA
Key Takeaways from the 2024 Trackinsight Global ETF Survey: Thematic ETFs
February 22, 2024
URA
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
URA
Advertisement
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
URA
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
URA
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
July 19, 2022
URA
Advertisement
