PBDvsNLRETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. PBD's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. PBD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.52% for NLR. PBD is up 9.21% year-to-date (YTD) with -$28M in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with -5.37% YTD performance, and +$902M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBD and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PBD vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/02/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBD NLR | -1.53%+5.33% | -21.65%-14.52% | +9.21%-5.37% | +28.26%+1.37% | +8.53%+92.41% | -35.14%+139.00% |
| Flows | PBD NLR | -$34M-$61M | -$33M-$183M | -$28M+$902M | +$44M+$2.17B | -$14M+$4.00B | -$105M+$4.05B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBD NLR | +28.09%+38.76% | +24.28%+38.98% | +24.14%+32.46% | +26.38%+27.52% |
| Max drawdown | PBD NLR | -24.65%-24.96% | -24.65%-36.67% | -43.61%-36.67% | -68.69%-36.67% |
| Max drawdown duration | PBD NLR | 92d92d | 92d217d | 770d217d | 1753d217d |
Trading data
PBD | NLR | |
Last sale 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM | $17.54 | $119.19 |
| Previous close 09/02/2026 | $17.41 | $117.03 |
| Consolidated volume 09/02/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PBD | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PBD | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $17.54 | $119.19 |
| 1D performance | +0.75% | +1.85% |
| AuM | $149.88 M | $4.09 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.52% |
Characteristics
PBD | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | VanEck |
| Benchmark | WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 110 | 25 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2007 | August 13, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PBD
USA
23.06%
Taiwan
13.93%
China
12.71%
Other
50.3%
NLR
USA
51.08%
Canada
18.8%
Australia
7.41%
Other
22.71%
Sectors
PBD
Industrials
52.73%
Utilities
17.28%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.65%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.89%
Technology
7.62%
Other
3.82%
NLR
Energy
39.26%
Utilities
31.2%
Industrials
23.85%
Other
5.69%
Advertisement
Diversification
PBD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
18.6%
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
83.33%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
PBD
Lucid Group, Inc.
1.49%
Voltronic Power Technology Corp.
1.49%
Itron, Inc.
1.48%
NFI Group, Inc.
1.38%
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
1.32%
Sino-American Silicon Products, Inc.
1.24%
Blue Bird Corp.
1.17%
TERNA Rete Elettrica Nazionale SpA
1.16%
Green Plains, Inc.
1.15%
Kingspan Group Plc
1.14%
Hubbell, Inc.
1.13%
Chung-Hsin Electric & Machinery Mfg. Corp.
1.12%
SPIE SA
1.11%
BYD Co., Ltd.
1.11%
Mercury NZ Ltd.
1.11%
NLR
Constellation Energy Corp.
9.13%
Cameco Corp.
7.79%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
7.24%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
6.17%
Fortum Oyj
5.91%
Centrus Energy Corp.
5.69%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
5.27%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.88%
Denison Mines Corp.
4.87%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.61%
CGN Power Co., Ltd.
4.53%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.45%
Oklo, Inc.
4.39%
NuScale Power Corp.
4.37%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.04%
Frequently asked questions about PBD and NLR
How have the PBD and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 2, 2026, PBD is up 9.21% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has lost -5.37%. That puts PBD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PBD or NLR?
Year-to-date, the PBD ETF saw -$28M in flows, compared to +$902M for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: PBD or NLR?
Over the past year, PBD had a volatility of 24.28%, while NLR experienced 38.98%.
Which ETF is bigger: PBD or NLR?
As of September 2, 2026, PBD holds $149.88 M in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $4.09 B.
What sectors do the PBD and NLR ETFs invest in?
PBD leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Energy, Utilities and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the PBD ETF and NLR ETF?
PBD top holdings include Lucid Group, Inc., Voltronic Power Technology Corp. and Itron, Inc.. NLR holds in its top three: Constellation Energy Corp., Cameco Corp. and Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PBD or NLR?
PBD holds 110 securities with 18.6% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 83.33%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PBD & NLR
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
NLR
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
July 19, 2022
NLR
Advertisement
