PBDvsNLRETF Comparison
VS
Invesco Global Clean Energy ETF (PBD) and VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. PBD's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. In contrast, NLR's top sector exposures are Utilities, Energy and Industrials. PBD is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.75%, versus 0.52% for NLR. PBD is up 13.82% year-to-date (YTD) with +$7M in YTD flows. NLR performs worse with -15.64% YTD performance, and +$1.00B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PBD and NLR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
PBD vs NLR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/17/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PBD NLR | -9.28%-16.38% | -7.29%-28.71% | +13.82%-15.64% | +37.97%-7.46% | -2.41%+86.71% | -28.16%+128.19% |
| Flows | PBD NLR | --$82M | +$11M+$113M | +$7M+$1.00B | +$78M+$2.65B | +$19M+$4.12B | -$71M+$4.15B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PBD NLR | +29.44%+38.11% | +23.88%+37.85% | +23.99%+31.59% | +26.37%+26.84% |
| Max drawdown | PBD NLR | -18.34%-29.50% | -18.34%-35.69% | -52.08%-35.69% | -68.69%-35.69% |
| Max drawdown duration | PBD NLR | 45d72d | 45d170d | 996d170d | 1706d170d |
Trading data
PBD | NLR | |
Last sale 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM | $18.15 | $104.20 |
| Previous close 07/16/2026 | $18.21 | $104.67 |
| Consolidated volume 07/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
PBD | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/17/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
PBD | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $18.15 | $104.20 |
| 1D performance | -0.33% | -0.45% |
| AuM | $191.74 M | $3.74 B |
| E/R | 0.75% | 0.52% |
Characteristics
PBD | NLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Invesco | VanEck |
| Benchmark | WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index |
| N° of holdings | 110 | 25 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 13, 2007 | August 13, 2007 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
PBD
USA
19.36%
Taiwan
12.03%
China
10.62%
Republic of Korea
9.89%
Other
48.1%
NLR
USA
50%
Canada
17.05%
Australia
7.25%
Other
25.71%
Sectors
PBD
Industrials
56.88%
Utilities
16.14%
Non-Energy Materi.
9.77%
Technology
8.69%
Other
8.52%
NLR
Utilities
37.99%
Energy
36.32%
Industrials
21.87%
Other
3.83%
Advertisement
Diversification
PBD
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.24%
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
78.67%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of May 31, 2026
PBD
ITM Power Plc
2.57%
Ballard Power Systems, Inc.
2.21%
Ceres Power Holdings plc
2.07%
Doosan Fuel Cell Co., Ltd.
1.92%
Plug Power, Inc.
1.68%
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
1.58%
Bloom Energy Corp.
1.55%
SMA Solar Technology AG
1.51%
Delta Electronics, Inc.
1.45%
LS Corp.
1.37%
LS Electric Co., Ltd.
1.33%
OY Nofar Energy Ltd.
1.28%
Alfen NV
1.27%
Samsung SDI Co., Ltd.
1.25%
West Holdings Corp.
1.22%
NLR
Cameco Corp.
8.12%
Constellation Energy Corp.
8.07%
BWX Technologies, Inc.
6.46%
Public Service Enterprise Group, Inc.
5.94%
Oklo, Inc.
5.17%
PG&E Corp.
5.15%
Fortum Oyj
4.81%
CEZ as
4.70%
Uranium Energy Corp.
4.56%
Paladin Energy Ltd.
4.41%
Energy Fuels, Inc.
4.38%
National Atomic Company Kazatomprom JSC
4.32%
NexGen Energy Ltd.
4.26%
NuScale Power Corp.
4.17%
CGN Power Co., Ltd.
4.14%
Frequently asked questions about PBD and NLR
How have the PBD and NLR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 17, 2026, PBD is up 13.82% year-to-date (YTD), while NLR has lost -15.64%. That puts PBD better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PBD or NLR?
Year-to-date, the PBD ETF saw +$7M in flows, compared to +$1.00B for NLR.
Which ETF is more volatile: PBD or NLR?
Over the past year, PBD had a volatility of 23.88%, while NLR experienced 37.85%.
Which ETF is bigger: PBD or NLR?
As of July 17, 2026, PBD holds $191.74 M in assets under management (AUM), while NLR manages $3.74 B.
What sectors do the PBD and NLR ETFs invest in?
PBD leans toward sectors like Industrials, Utilities and Non-Energy Materials. Meanwhile, NLR focuses on Utilities, Energy and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the PBD ETF and NLR ETF?
PBD top holdings include ITM Power Plc, Ballard Power Systems, Inc. and Ceres Power Holdings plc. NLR holds in its top three: Cameco Corp., Constellation Energy Corp. and BWX Technologies, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: PBD or NLR?
PBD holds 110 securities with 24.24% of its assets in the top 15. NLR has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.67%.
Advertisement
Latest news about PBD & NLR
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
3 uranium ETFs to watch as demand for clean energy rises
August 12, 2022
NLR
Nuclear Energy ETFs – Ways to play the energy source
July 19, 2022
NLR
Advertisement
