Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
PALCvsSPYVETF Comparison
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) is part of the US Large Cap Value segment. PALC's top 3 sector exposures are Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. In contrast, SPYV's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Health Care. PALC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.6%, versus 0.04% for SPYV. PALC is down -0.56% year-to-date (YTD) with +$15M in YTD flows. SPYV performs worse with -1.65% YTD performance, and +$218M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of PALC and SPYV below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
PALC vs SPYV performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | PALC SPYV | -6.38%-5.73% | -1.23%-2.20% | -0.56%-1.65% | +8.60%+11.20% | +62.01%+50.83% | +52.08%+64.27% |
| Flows | PALC SPYV | +$31M+$134M | +$4M-$5.76B | +$15M+$218M | -$78M+$3.64B | -$56M+$8.75B | +$153M+$13.89B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | PALC SPYV | +13.31%+10.70% | +14.99%+15.50% | +14.42%+12.77% | +16.32%+14.47% |
| Max drawdown | PALC SPYV | -7.06%-6.16% | -12.25%-12.33% | -17.18%-17.49% | -24.36%-17.95% |
| Max drawdown duration | PALC SPYV | 19d19d | 99d53d | 327d263d | 809d286d |
PALC | SPYV | |
Last sale 3/20/2026 at 1:30 PM | $51.90 | $55.84 |
| Previous close 03/19/2026 | $52.35 | $56.39 |
| Consolidated volume 03/19/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
PALC | SPYV | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
PALC | SPYV | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $51.90 | $55.84 |
| 1D performance | -0.86% | -0.98% |
| AuM | $262.03 M | $31.26 B |
| E/R | 0.6% | 0.04% |
PALC | SPYV | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | PACER ETFs | SPDR |
| Benchmark | Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index | S&P 500 Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 173 | 425 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | June 24, 2020 | September 25, 2000 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the PALC and SPYV ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 20, 2026, PALC is down -0.56% year-to-date (YTD), while SPYV has lost -1.65%. That puts PALC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: PALC or SPYV?
Year-to-date, the PALC ETF saw +$15M in flows, compared to +$218M for SPYV.
Which ETF is more volatile: PALC or SPYV?
Over the past year, PALC had a volatility of 14.99%, while SPYV experienced 15.5%.
Which ETF is bigger: PALC or SPYV?
As of March 20, 2026, PALC holds $262.03 M in assets under management (AUM), while SPYV manages $31.26 B.
What sectors do the PALC and SPYV ETFs invest in?
PALC leans toward sectors like Health Care, Information Technology and Industrials. Meanwhile, SPYV focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the PALC ETF and SPYV ETF?
PALC top holdings include MERCK & CO INC, UNITEDHEALTH GRP and PEPSICO U. SPYV holds in its top three: APPLE, AMAZON.COM INC and EXXON.
Which ETF is more diversified: PALC or SPYV?
PALC holds 179 securities with 37.42% of its assets in the top 15. SPYV has 442 securities and a top 15 weight of 27.37%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
