OZEMvsCANCETF Comparison
Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) belong to the same industry segment: Tomorrow's Treatments. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: and Healthcare. OZEM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.59%, versus 0.99% for CANC. OZEM is down -5.02% year-to-date (YTD) with +$22M in YTD flows. CANC performs better with 18.41% YTD performance, and +$52M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OZEM and CANC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OZEM vs CANC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OZEM CANC | -0.73%-0.28% | +5.00%+8.61% | -5.02%+18.41% | +23.49%+53.77% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | OZEM CANC | +$10M-$2M | +$9M+$3M | +$22M+$52M | +$22M+$76M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OZEM CANC | +21.47%+23.01% | +22.73%+22.71% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | OZEM CANC | -6.63%-5.93% | -19.51%-9.20% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | OZEM CANC | 51d47d | 182d67d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
OZEM | CANC | |
Last sale 7/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.81 | $41.18 |
| Previous close 07/27/2026 | $32.55 | $41.10 |
| Consolidated volume 07/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
OZEM | CANC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.81 | $41.18 |
| 1D performance | +0.80% | +0.20% |
| AuM | $62.51 M | $195.62 M |
| E/R | 0.59% | 0.99% |
OZEM | CANC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Roundhill Investments | Tema |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 24 | 56 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | May 21, 2024 | August 15, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
