OVLvsGPIQETF Comparison
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF
Overlay Shares Large Cap Equity ETF (OVL) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq 100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. OVL is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.35% for GPIQ. OVL is up 15.69% year-to-date (YTD) with +$323M in YTD flows. GPIQ performs better with 16.68% YTD performance, and +$3.70B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OVL and GPIQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OVL vs GPIQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OVL GPIQ | +0.60%-1.34% | +4.81%+5.41% | +15.69%+16.68% | +15.63%+16.08% | +108.29%+97.52% | +81.24%n/a |
| Flows | OVL GPIQ | +$57M+$553M | +$172M+$1.40B | +$323M+$3.70B | +$324M+$4.36B | +$280M+$6.11B | +$269M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OVL GPIQ | +13.58%+16.00% | +14.82%+17.30% | +17.05%+17.93% | +18.98%n/a |
| Max drawdown | OVL GPIQ | -3.71%-5.87% | -8.71%-9.57% | -21.55%-21.18% | -28.68%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | OVL GPIQ | 53d21d | 47d75d | 133d124d | 745dn/a |
OVL | GPIQ | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $56.92 | $56.49 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $56.50 | $55.81 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
OVL | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $56.92 | $56.49 |
| 1D performance | +0.74% | +1.22% |
| AuM | $518.35 M | $6.49 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.35% |
OVL | GPIQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Overlay Shares | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 25, 2019 | October 26, 2023 |
| ESG | No | No |
