OUSMvsEPSBETF Comparison
VS
ALPS O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and Harbor SMID Cap Core ETF (EPSB) belong to the same industry segment: US Multi-Factor. OUSM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Industrials and Technology. In contrast, EPSB's top sector exposures are Industrials, Finance and Technology. OUSM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.48%, versus 0.88% for EPSB. OUSM is up 11.06% year-to-date (YTD) with -$157M in YTD flows. EPSB performs better with 18.51% YTD performance, and - in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OUSM and EPSB below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OUSM vs EPSB performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/10/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OUSM EPSB | -3.33%-3.52% | +4.79%-1.28% | +11.06%+18.51% | +9.13%+19.53% | +41.27%n/a | +48.08%n/a |
| Flows | OUSM EPSB | -$22M- | -$79M- | -$157M- | -$227M+$584K | +$305M- | +$489M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OUSM EPSB | +12.15%+11.95% | +12.80%+14.93% | +15.11%n/a | +16.45%n/a |
| Max drawdown | OUSM EPSB | -4.58%-6.18% | -9.24%-8.47% | -19.49%n/a | -19.49%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | OUSM EPSB | 25d26d | 124d49d | 435dn/a | 435dn/a |
Trading data
OUSM | EPSB | |
Last sale 9/14/2026 at 1:33 PM | $26.58 | |
| Previous close 09/11/2026 | $26.90 | |
| Consolidated volume 09/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
EPSB
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOUSM | EPSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/14/2026 at 1:33 PM
Live
Closed
OUSM | EPSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $26.58 |
| 1D performance | – | -1.19% |
| AuM | $824.93 M | $4.71 M |
| E/R | 0.48% | 0.88% |
Characteristics
OUSM | EPSB | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | O'Shares | Harbor Capital |
| Benchmark | O’Shares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 109 | 56 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 30, 2016 | May 1, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OUSM
USA
97.86%
Other
2.14%
EPSB
USA
96.67%
Other
3.33%
Sectors
OUSM
Finance
22.18%
Industrials
18.11%
Technology
11.54%
Consumer Services
9.79%
Consumer Cyclical.
8.72%
Healthcare
8.47%
Other
21.18%
EPSB
Industrials
24.69%
Finance
22.89%
Technology
14.07%
Non-Energy Materi.
10%
Healthcare
9.17%
Other
19.19%
Advertisement
Diversification
OUSM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.61%
EPSB
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
37.66%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
OUSM
Chemed Corp.
2.42%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
2.34%
SEI Investments Co.
2.23%
National HealthCare Corp.
2.20%
Primerica, Inc.
2.19%
Radian Group Inc.
2.18%
MGIC Investment Corp.
2.17%
Essent Group Ltd.
2.15%
Donaldson Co., Inc.
2.11%
Royalty Pharma Plc
2.02%
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.94%
The New York Times Co.
1.93%
Avnet, Inc.
1.92%
ITT, Inc.
1.91%
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
1.90%
EPSB
Moog, Inc.
3.71%
Woodward, Inc.
3.16%
Archrock, Inc.
2.83%
Ryder System, Inc.
2.80%
Teledyne Technologies, Inc.
2.59%
Reinsurance Group of America, Inc.
2.46%
Snap-On, Inc.
2.35%
FormFactor, Inc.
2.35%
Arrow Electronics, Inc.
2.29%
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
2.24%
CBRE Group, Inc.
2.20%
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
2.20%
Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.
2.17%
BorgWarner, Inc.
2.16%
Hexcel Corp.
2.16%
Frequently asked questions about OUSM and EPSB
How have the OUSM and EPSB ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 10, 2026, OUSM is up 11.06% year-to-date (YTD), while EPSB has returned 18.51%. That puts EPSB better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OUSM or EPSB?
Year-to-date, the OUSM ETF saw -$157M in flows, compared to - for EPSB.
Which ETF is more volatile: OUSM or EPSB?
Over the past year, OUSM had a volatility of 12.8%, while EPSB experienced 14.93%.
Which ETF is bigger: OUSM or EPSB?
As of September 10, 2026, OUSM holds $824.93 M in assets under management (AUM), while EPSB manages $4.71 M.
What sectors do the OUSM and EPSB ETFs invest in?
OUSM leans toward sectors like Finance, Industrials and Technology. Meanwhile, EPSB focuses on Industrials, Finance and Technology.
What are the top holdings of the OUSM ETF and EPSB ETF?
OUSM top holdings include Chemed Corp., Texas Roadhouse, Inc. and SEI Investments Co.. EPSB holds in its top three: Moog, Inc., Woodward, Inc. and Archrock, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: OUSM or EPSB?
OUSM holds 109 securities with 31.61% of its assets in the top 15. EPSB has 56 securities and a top 15 weight of 37.66%.
Advertisement
Latest news about OUSM & EPSB
Advertisement
Advertisement
