Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
OUSAvsPRCSETF Comparison
ALPS O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Parnassus Core Select ETF (PRCS) is part of the US Large Cap segment. OUSA's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, PRCS's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. OUSA is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.48%, versus 0.58% for PRCS. OUSA is down -0.3% year-to-date (YTD) with -$51M in YTD flows. PRCS performs worse with -2.73% YTD performance, and +$27M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OUSA and PRCS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OUSA vs PRCS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OUSA PRCS | -3.44%-1.62% | -0.49%-2.87% | -0.30%-2.73% | +9.91%+13.62% | +50.62%n/a | +62.12%n/a |
| Flows | OUSA PRCS | -$7M+$11M | -$54M+$40M | -$51M+$27M | -$112M+$100M | -$154M- | -$131M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OUSA PRCS | +8.92%+12.30% | +13.99%+17.67% | +11.56%n/a | +13.65%n/a |
| Max drawdown | OUSA PRCS | -3.98%-6.45% | -10.22%-13.65% | -13.19%n/a | -19.56%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | OUSA PRCS | 31d43d | 49d45d | 253dn/a | 709dn/a |
OUSA | PRCS | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $25.56 | |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $25.68 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
OUSA | PRCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
OUSA | PRCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $25.56 |
| 1D performance | – | -0.47% |
| AuM | $760.26 M | $119.48 M |
| E/R | 0.48% | 0.58% |
OUSA | PRCS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | O'Shares | Parnassus Investments |
| Benchmark | O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend Index | - |
| N° of holdings | 97 | 24 |
| Asset class | Equities | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 14, 2015 | December 12, 2024 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the OUSA and PRCS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, OUSA is down -0.3% year-to-date (YTD), while PRCS has lost -2.73%. That puts OUSA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OUSA or PRCS?
Year-to-date, the OUSA ETF saw -$51M in flows, compared to +$27M for PRCS.
Which ETF is more volatile: OUSA or PRCS?
Over the past year, OUSA had a volatility of 13.99%, while PRCS experienced 17.67%.
Which ETF is bigger: OUSA or PRCS?
As of March 11, 2026, OUSA holds $760.26 M in assets under management (AUM), while PRCS manages $119.48 M.
What sectors do the OUSA and PRCS ETFs invest in?
OUSA leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, PRCS focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care.
What are the top holdings of the OUSA ETF and PRCS ETF?
OUSA top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and APPLE. PRCS holds in its top three: ALPHABET INC-CL, MICROSOFT-T and APPLIED MATERIAL.
Which ETF is more diversified: OUSA or PRCS?
OUSA holds 98 securities with 56.46% of its assets in the top 15. PRCS has 25 securities and a top 15 weight of 78.8%.
Parnassus Investments Expands Into ETFs: PRCS and PRVS
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
