Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
OUSAvsFDRRETF Comparison
ALPS O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) belongs to the US Multi-Factor segment. Fidelity Dividend for Rising Rates ETF (FDRR) is part of the US High Dividend segment. OUSA's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, FDRR's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. OUSA is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.48%, versus 0.15% for FDRR. OUSA is up 0.4% year-to-date (YTD) with -$51M in YTD flows. FDRR performs worse with -0.05% YTD performance, and +$3M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OUSA and FDRR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OUSA vs FDRR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OUSA FDRR | -2.82%-3.28% | +1.10%-0.96% | +0.40%-0.05% | +8.49%+23.80% | +52.16%+69.46% | +63.56%+73.75% |
| Flows | OUSA FDRR | -$12M+$3M | -$54M+$16M | -$51M+$3M | -$112M+$16M | -$154M-$116M | -$131M+$77M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OUSA FDRR | +8.99%+10.00% | +14.12%+16.52% | +11.55%+13.30% | +13.65%+14.70% |
| Max drawdown | OUSA FDRR | -3.30%-3.82% | -11.24%-13.95% | -13.19%-17.87% | -19.56%-20.85% |
| Max drawdown duration | OUSA FDRR | 30d30d | 87d51d | 253d126d | 709d708d |
OUSA | FDRR | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $60.07 | |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $60.75 | |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
OUSA | FDRR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
OUSA | FDRR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | – | $60.07 |
| 1D performance | – | -1.12% |
| AuM | $765.66 M | $662.94 M |
| E/R | 0.48% | 0.15% |
OUSA | FDRR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | O'Shares | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | O’Shares U.S. Quality Dividend Index | Fidelity Dividend for Rising Rates Index |
| N° of holdings | 97 | 105 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 14, 2015 | September 12, 2016 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the OUSA and FDRR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, OUSA is up 0.4% year-to-date (YTD), while FDRR has lost -0.05%. That puts OUSA better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OUSA or FDRR?
Year-to-date, the OUSA ETF saw -$51M in flows, compared to +$3M for FDRR.
Which ETF is more volatile: OUSA or FDRR?
Over the past year, OUSA had a volatility of 14.12%, while FDRR experienced 16.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: OUSA or FDRR?
As of March 10, 2026, OUSA holds $765.66 M in assets under management (AUM), while FDRR manages $662.94 M.
What sectors do the OUSA and FDRR ETFs invest in?
OUSA leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Health Care and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, FDRR focuses on Information Technology, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the OUSA ETF and FDRR ETF?
OUSA top holdings include ALPHABET INC-CL, JOHNSON&JOHNSON and APPLE. FDRR holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: OUSA or FDRR?
OUSA holds 98 securities with 56.46% of its assets in the top 15. FDRR has 112 securities and a top 15 weight of 46.87%.
Dividend Growth, High Yield, & Dividend Quality ETFs: What's the Difference?
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
