OPERvsQDPLETF Comparison
VS
ETF 2
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
This fund is part of
Alternatives
-0.73%
ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF (OPER) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) belong to the same industry segment: Alternatives. OPER is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.2%, versus 0.6% for QDPL. OPER is up 3.01% year-to-date (YTD) with -$3M in YTD flows. QDPL performs better with 12.06% YTD performance, and +$300M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OPER and QDPL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OPER vs QDPL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/16/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OPER QDPL | +0.33%+1.34% | +0.97%+1.65% | +3.01%+12.06% | +3.87%+15.84% | +14.49%+73.85% | +21.17%+75.18% |
| Flows | OPER QDPL | +$3M+$35M | +$8M+$119M | -$3M+$300M | +$8M+$420M | -$113M+$1.37B | -$63M+$1.52B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OPER QDPL | +0.14%+10.24% | +0.14%+11.68% | +0.18%+13.54% | +0.19%+15.34% |
| Max drawdown | OPER QDPL | n/a-2.82% | n/a-8.32% | n/a-17.47% | n/a-22.44% |
| Max drawdown duration | OPER QDPL | n/a53d | n/a70d | n/a126d | n/a704d |
Trading data
OPER | QDPL | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $100.23 | $45.95 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $100.18 | $46.38 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OPER
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOPER | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OPER | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $100.23 | $45.95 |
| 1D performance | +0.05% | -0.93% |
| AuM | $117.80 M | $1.83 B |
| E/R | 0.2% | 0.6% |
Characteristics
OPER | QDPL | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Clear Shares | PACER ETFs |
| Benchmark | - | Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier Series 400 Index |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | July 11, 2018 | July 13, 2021 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OPER
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Sectors
OPER
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
OPER
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
OPER
Data will be available soon
QDPL
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about OPER and QDPL
How have the OPER and QDPL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 16, 2026, OPER is up 3.01% year-to-date (YTD), while QDPL has returned 12.06%. That puts QDPL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OPER or QDPL?
Year-to-date, the OPER ETF saw -$3M in flows, compared to +$300M for QDPL.
Which ETF is more volatile: OPER or QDPL?
Over the past year, OPER had a volatility of 0.14%, while QDPL experienced 11.68%.
Which ETF is bigger: OPER or QDPL?
As of October 16, 2026, OPER holds $117.80 M in assets under management (AUM), while QDPL manages $1.83 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about OPER & QDPL
Advertisement
Advertisement
