ONOFvsCSHIETF Comparison
VS
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) and NEOS Enhanced Income 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CSHI) belong to the same industry segment: Multi-Asset: Other. ONOF is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.39%, versus 0.38% for CSHI. ONOF is up 9.91% year-to-date (YTD) with -$13M in YTD flows. CSHI performs worse with 4% YTD performance, and +$1.28B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ONOF and CSHI below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
ONOF vs CSHI performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ONOF CSHI | +0.46%+0.37% | +4.43%+1.10% | +9.91%+4.00% | +9.35%+4.87% | +55.77%+16.80% | +47.27%n/a |
| Flows | ONOF CSHI | -+$201M | -$324K+$555M | -$13M+$1.28B | -$10M+$1.41B | +$5M+$1.88B | +$8M- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ONOF CSHI | +11.38%+0.22% | +12.14%+0.52% | +14.23%+1.10% | +14.53%n/a |
| Max drawdown | ONOF CSHI | -3.10%n/a | -6.75%-0.18% | -21.66%-1.52% | -25.41%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | ONOF CSHI | 53dn/a | 107d6d | 205d20d | 756dn/a |
Trading data
ONOF | CSHI | |
Last sale 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM | $41.17 | $49.68 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $40.88 | $49.66 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
CSHI
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexONOF | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/27/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
ONOF | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $41.17 | $49.68 |
| 1D performance | +0.69% | +0.04% |
| AuM | $142.38 M | $2.09 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0.38% |
Characteristics
ONOF | CSHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Active |
| Provider | Global X | NEOS Investment Management |
| Benchmark | Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | Alternative | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 13, 2021 | August 30, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
ONOF
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Sectors
ONOF
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Advertisement
Diversification
ONOF
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Top 15 holdings
Data as of January 1, 1970
ONOF
Data will be available soon
CSHI
Data will be available soon
Frequently asked questions about ONOF and CSHI
How have the ONOF and CSHI ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, ONOF is up 9.91% year-to-date (YTD), while CSHI has returned 4%. That puts ONOF better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ONOF or CSHI?
Year-to-date, the ONOF ETF saw -$13M in flows, compared to +$1.28B for CSHI.
Which ETF is more volatile: ONOF or CSHI?
Over the past year, ONOF had a volatility of 12.14%, while CSHI experienced 0.52%.
Which ETF is bigger: ONOF or CSHI?
As of October 27, 2026, ONOF holds $142.38 M in assets under management (AUM), while CSHI manages $2.09 B.
Advertisement
Latest news about ONOF & CSHI
Advertisement
Advertisement
