Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
ONOFvsBKLCETF Comparison
Global X Adaptive U.S. Risk Management ETF (ONOF) and BNY Mellon US Large Cap Core Equity ETF (BKLC) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. ONOF is down -0.95% year-to-date (YTD) with +$2M in YTD flows. BKLC performs better with -0.69% YTD performance, and +$382M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of ONOF and BKLC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
ONOF vs BKLC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ONOF BKLC | -2.13%-2.24% | -1.60%-0.67% | -0.95%-0.69% | +13.04%+22.90% | +46.26%+87.66% | +56.28%+90.64% |
| Flows | ONOF BKLC | +$3M+$197M | +$4M+$414M | +$2M+$382M | +$5M+$1.58B | +$39M+$2.26B | +$52M+$3.72B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | ONOF BKLC | +11.79%+11.86% | +17.24%+18.43% | +14.17%+15.14% | +14.46%+17.54% |
| Max drawdown | ONOF BKLC | -3.48%-3.45% | -13.89%-13.92% | -21.66%-19.17% | -25.41%-26.14% |
| Max drawdown duration | ONOF BKLC | 57d41d | 91d45d | 205d126d | 756d707d |
ONOF | BKLC | |
Last sale 3/11/2026 at 1:30 PM | $37.19 | $129.41 |
| Previous close 03/10/2026 | $37.20 | $129.50 |
| Consolidated volume 03/10/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
ONOF | BKLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
ONOF | BKLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $37.19 | $129.41 |
| 1D performance | -0.03% | -0.07% |
| AuM | $142.62 M | $5.27 B |
| E/R | 0.39% | 0% |
ONOF | BKLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | Global X | BNY Mellon |
| Benchmark | Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Risk Management Index | Solactive GBS United States 500 Index |
| N° of holdings | 470 | 470 |
| Asset class | Alternative | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 13, 2021 | April 7, 2020 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the ONOF and BKLC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, ONOF is down -0.95% year-to-date (YTD), while BKLC has lost -0.69%. That puts BKLC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: ONOF or BKLC?
Year-to-date, the ONOF ETF saw +$2M in flows, compared to +$382M for BKLC.
Which ETF is more volatile: ONOF or BKLC?
Over the past year, ONOF had a volatility of 17.24%, while BKLC experienced 18.43%.
Which ETF is bigger: ONOF or BKLC?
As of March 10, 2026, ONOF holds $142.62 M in assets under management (AUM), while BKLC manages $5.27 B.
What sectors do the ONOF and BKLC ETFs invest in?
ONOF leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, BKLC focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the ONOF ETF and BKLC ETF?
ONOF top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. BKLC holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: ONOF or BKLC?
ONOF holds 504 securities with 43.08% of its assets in the top 15. BKLC has 504 securities and a top 15 weight of 42.93%.
State Street Global Advisors' 2024 US ETF Impact Survey: Key Takeaways and ETFs to Watch
Meet the Ultra-Affordable, Zero-Expense Ratio ETFs from BNY Mellon
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
