Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
OALCvsFHEQETF Comparison
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) belongs to the US Large Cap segment. Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) is part of the Options Strategies segment. OALC's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. In contrast, FHEQ's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials. OALC is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.58%, versus 0.52% for FHEQ. OALC is down -0.03% year-to-date (YTD) with +$9M in YTD flows. FHEQ performs worse with -2.37% YTD performance, and +$86M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OALC and FHEQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
OALC vs FHEQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OALC FHEQ | -2.13%-1.68% | -0.96%-2.38% | -0.03%-2.37% | +25.55%+14.22% | +73.33%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | OALC FHEQ | +$5M+$5M | +$14M+$205M | +$9M+$86M | +$52M+$392M | +$118M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OALC FHEQ | +12.72%+8.47% | +17.20%+11.05% | +14.47%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | OALC FHEQ | -3.59%-3.74% | -12.16%-6.29% | -17.48%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | OALC FHEQ | 42d38d | 46d45d | 133dn/a | n/an/a |
OALC | FHEQ | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $34.82 | $30.14 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $35.43 | $30.44 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
OALC | FHEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.82 | $30.14 |
| 1D performance | -1.72% | -0.99% |
| AuM | $201.67 M | $827.17 M |
| E/R | 0.58% | 0.52% |
OALC | FHEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | OneAscent Investments | Fidelity |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 198 | 129 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 16, 2021 | April 9, 2024 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the OALC and FHEQ ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, OALC is down -0.03% year-to-date (YTD), while FHEQ has lost -2.37%. That puts OALC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OALC or FHEQ?
Year-to-date, the OALC ETF saw +$9M in flows, compared to +$86M for FHEQ.
Which ETF is more volatile: OALC or FHEQ?
Over the past year, OALC had a volatility of 17.2%, while FHEQ experienced 11.05%.
Which ETF is bigger: OALC or FHEQ?
As of March 11, 2026, OALC holds $201.67 M in assets under management (AUM), while FHEQ manages $827.17 M.
What sectors do the OALC and FHEQ ETFs invest in?
OALC leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Meanwhile, FHEQ focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the OALC ETF and FHEQ ETF?
OALC top holdings include NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and AMAZON.COM INC. FHEQ holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: OALC or FHEQ?
OALC holds 201 securities with 38.93% of its assets in the top 15. FHEQ has 135 securities and a top 15 weight of 47.21%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
