OAKMvsREVSETF Comparison
VS
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) and Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Value. OAKM's top 3 sector exposures are Financials, Energy and Health Care. In contrast, REVS's top sector exposures are Financials, Information Technology and Industrials. OAKM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.64%, versus 0.2% for REVS. OAKM is down -2.08% year-to-date (YTD) with +$133M in YTD flows. REVS performs better with 11.87% YTD performance, and +$143M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OAKM and REVS below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OAKM vs REVS performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 06/18/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OAKM REVS | -0.73%+2.17% | +2.47%+11.45% | -2.08%+11.87% | +11.74%+26.24% | n/a+64.18% | n/a+79.90% |
| Flows | OAKM REVS | -$1M+$6M | -$15M+$40M | +$133M+$143M | +$491M+$199M | -+$244M | -+$257M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OAKM REVS | +11.98%+12.27% | +13.19%+11.31% | n/a+13.16% | n/a+15.10% |
| Max drawdown | OAKM REVS | -4.08%-2.01% | -7.12%-6.87% | n/a-16.16% | n/a-17.78% |
| Max drawdown duration | OAKM REVS | 59d7d | 161d66d | n/a211d | n/a448d |
Trading data
OAKM | REVS | |
Last sale 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM | $27.75 | $31.63 |
| Previous close 06/18/2026 | $27.85 | $31.55 |
| Consolidated volume 06/18/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of May 29, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OAKM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOAKM | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 6/18/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OAKM | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $27.75 | $31.63 |
| 1D performance | -0.36% | +0.25% |
| AuM | $1.05 B | $308.34 M |
| E/R | 0.64% | 0.2% |
Characteristics
OAKM | REVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Oakmark Funds | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Benchmark | - | Beta Advantage Research Enhanced U.S. Value Index |
| N° of holdings | 36 | 277 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 2, 2024 | September 25, 2019 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OAKM
USA
93.41%
Other
6.59%
REVS
USA
94.09%
Other
5.91%
Sectors
OAKM
Financials
30.31%
Energy
12.24%
Health Care
10.26%
Information Techn.
9.91%
Industrials
7.63%
Communication Ser.
7.26%
Other
22.39%
REVS
Financials
18.62%
Information Techn.
12.59%
Industrials
12.16%
Health Care
11.41%
Communication Ser.
8.19%
Consumer Discreti.
7.78%
Other
29.25%
Diversification
OAKM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.56%
REVS
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
35.02%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of April 30, 2026
OAKM
CONOCOPHILLIPS
4.88%
STATE STREET
3.97%
TARGA RESOURCS
3.93%
CITIGROUP
3.76%
KEURIG DR PEPPER INC
3.53%
SALESFORCE INC
3.52%
PHILLIPS 66
3.43%
AIRBNB
3.38%
WILLIS TOWERS WATSON
3.37%
CORTEVA INC
3.29%
INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE INC
3.27%
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC
3.18%
BK OF AMERICA CO
3.17%
FISERV
2.98%
CHARLES SCHWAB
2.89%
REVS
EXXON
3.40%
PROCTERGAMBLE
3.39%
WELLS FARGO
3.25%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.01%
CISCO-T
2.96%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.44%
CITIGROUP
2.37%
PFIZER
2.27%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
1.89%
CHEVRON TEXACO
1.88%
UNION PACIFIC U
1.78%
CHARLES SCHWAB
1.77%
S&P GLOBAL INC
1.72%
CVS HEALTH CORP
1.48%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
1.41%
Frequently asked questions about OAKM and REVS
How have the OAKM and REVS ETFs performed in 2026?
As of June 18, 2026, OAKM is down -2.08% year-to-date (YTD), while REVS has returned 11.87%. That puts REVS better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OAKM or REVS?
Year-to-date, the OAKM ETF saw +$133M in flows, compared to +$143M for REVS.
Which ETF is more volatile: OAKM or REVS?
Over the past year, OAKM had a volatility of 13.19%, while REVS experienced 11.31%.
Which ETF is bigger: OAKM or REVS?
As of June 18, 2026, OAKM holds $1.05 B in assets under management (AUM), while REVS manages $308.34 M.
What sectors do the OAKM and REVS ETFs invest in?
OAKM leans toward sectors like Financials, Energy and Health Care. Meanwhile, REVS focuses on Financials, Information Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the OAKM ETF and REVS ETF?
OAKM top holdings include CONOCOPHILLIPS, STATE STREET and TARGA RESOURCS. REVS holds in its top three: EXXON, PROCTERGAMBLE and WELLS FARGO.
Which ETF is more diversified: OAKM or REVS?
OAKM holds 36 securities with 52.56% of its assets in the top 15. REVS has 281 securities and a top 15 weight of 35.02%.
Advertisement
Latest news about OAKM & REVS
Advertisement
Advertisement
