OAKMvsFCTRETF Comparison
VS
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) belongs to the US Large Cap Value segment. First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. OAKM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, FCTR's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. OAKM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.64%, versus 0.65% for FCTR. OAKM is up 9.45% year-to-date (YTD) with +$111M in YTD flows. FCTR performs better with 12.57% YTD performance, and -$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OAKM and FCTR below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OAKM vs FCTR performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 09/15/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OAKM FCTR | +0.82%-1.40% | +10.00%-2.52% | +9.45%+12.57% | +16.61%+14.80% | n/a+58.33% | n/a+17.24% |
| Flows | OAKM FCTR | -$8M- | -$18M- | +$111M-$4M | +$355M-$11M | --$100M | --$313M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OAKM FCTR | +13.37%+20.19% | +13.40%+19.55% | n/a+18.93% | n/a+20.42% |
| Max drawdown | OAKM FCTR | -4.09%-10.03% | -7.12%-11.18% | n/a-22.60% | n/a-37.23% |
| Max drawdown duration | OAKM FCTR | 12d91d | 174d37d | n/a231d | n/a1186d |
Trading data
OAKM | FCTR | |
Last sale 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.58 | $39.18 |
| Previous close 09/15/2026 | $31.01 | $39.62 |
| Consolidated volume 09/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OAKM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOAKM | FCTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 9/16/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OAKM | FCTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.58 | $39.18 |
| 1D performance | -1.39% | -1.11% |
| AuM | $1.15 B | $55.99 M |
| E/R | 0.64% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
OAKM | FCTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Oakmark Funds | First Trust |
| Benchmark | - | Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index |
| N° of holdings | 39 | 165 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 2, 2024 | July 25, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OAKM
USA
91.9%
Other
8.1%
FCTR
USA
95.63%
Other
4.37%
Sectors
OAKM
Finance
40.01%
Healthcare
13.19%
Technology
11.69%
Other
35.11%
FCTR
Finance
35.6%
Technology
13.21%
Healthcare
12.74%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10%
Industrials
7.43%
Other
21.02%
Advertisement
Diversification
OAKM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
50.35%
FCTR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
21.33%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of July 31, 2026
OAKM
Willis Towers Watson Plc
3.71%
Citigroup, Inc.
3.63%
Targa Resources Corp.
3.53%
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.
3.53%
Airbnb, Inc.
3.46%
Bank of America Corp.
3.45%
Capital One Financial Corp.
3.44%
State Street Corp.
3.39%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
3.37%
Salesforce, Inc.
3.30%
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc.
3.24%
Merck & Co., Inc.
3.15%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
3.10%
Corteva, Inc.
3.04%
Elevance Health, Inc.
3.01%
FCTR
Humana, Inc.
2.15%
Centene Corp.
2.04%
The Allstate Corp.
1.60%
Visa, Inc.
1.54%
Mastercard, Inc.
1.44%
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
1.40%
The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc.
1.37%
The Travelers Cos., Inc.
1.35%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.32%
The Bank of New York Mellon Corp.
1.29%
The Coca-Cola Co.
1.26%
Johnson & Johnson
1.17%
Super Micro Computer, Inc.
1.14%
Adobe, Inc.
1.14%
Intuit, Inc.
1.12%
Frequently asked questions about OAKM and FCTR
How have the OAKM and FCTR ETFs performed in 2026?
As of September 15, 2026, OAKM is up 9.45% year-to-date (YTD), while FCTR has returned 12.57%. That puts FCTR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OAKM or FCTR?
Year-to-date, the OAKM ETF saw +$111M in flows, compared to -$4M for FCTR.
Which ETF is more volatile: OAKM or FCTR?
Over the past year, OAKM had a volatility of 13.4%, while FCTR experienced 19.55%.
Which ETF is bigger: OAKM or FCTR?
As of September 15, 2026, OAKM holds $1.15 B in assets under management (AUM), while FCTR manages $55.99 M.
What sectors do the OAKM and FCTR ETFs invest in?
OAKM leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, FCTR focuses on Finance, Technology and Healthcare.
What are the top holdings of the OAKM ETF and FCTR ETF?
OAKM top holdings include Willis Towers Watson Plc, Citigroup, Inc. and Targa Resources Corp.. FCTR holds in its top three: Humana, Inc., Centene Corp. and The Allstate Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: OAKM or FCTR?
OAKM holds 40 securities with 50.35% of its assets in the top 15. FCTR has 165 securities and a top 15 weight of 21.33%.
Advertisement
Latest news about OAKM & FCTR
Advertisement
