OAKMvsBMVPETF Comparison
VS
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) belongs to the US Large Cap Value segment. Invesco Bloomberg MVP Multi-Factor ETF (BMVP) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. OAKM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, BMVP's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. OAKM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.64%, versus 0.29% for BMVP. OAKM is up 6.71% year-to-date (YTD) with +$149M in YTD flows. BMVP performs better with 10.15% YTD performance, and -$4M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OAKM and BMVP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
OAKM vs BMVP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/30/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | OAKM BMVP | +7.33%+4.38% | +6.91%+3.68% | +6.71%+10.15% | +16.83%+12.85% | n/a+42.32% | n/a+41.50% |
| Flows | OAKM BMVP | +$33M- | -$24M-$1M | +$149M-$4M | +$442M-$17M | --$20M | --$48M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | OAKM BMVP | +13.01%+9.60% | +13.55%+9.98% | n/a+12.07% | n/a+15.93% |
| Max drawdown | OAKM BMVP | -2.85%-2.66% | -7.12%-6.86% | n/a-15.00% | n/a-26.49% |
| Max drawdown duration | OAKM BMVP | 29d22d | 174d165d | n/a374d | n/a799d |
Trading data
OAKM | BMVP | |
Last sale 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM | $30.17 | $53.43 |
| Previous close 07/30/2026 | $30.26 | $53.50 |
| Consolidated volume 07/30/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of August 1, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
OAKM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexOAKM | BMVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/31/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OAKM | BMVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $30.17 | $53.43 |
| 1D performance | -0.30% | -0.13% |
| AuM | $1.16 B | $104.34 M |
| E/R | 0.64% | 0.29% |
Characteristics
OAKM | BMVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Oakmark Funds | Invesco |
| Benchmark | - | Bloomberg MVP Index |
| N° of holdings | 38 | 56 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | December 2, 2024 | May 1, 2003 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
OAKM
USA
92.58%
Other
7.42%
BMVP
USA
97.81%
Other
2.19%
Sectors
OAKM
Finance
39.93%
Healthcare
13.47%
Technology
9.42%
Energy
7.96%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.04%
Other
22.17%
BMVP
Finance
22.43%
Technology
16.8%
Industrials
14.27%
Healthcare
9.84%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.43%
Non-Energy Materi.
7.33%
Other
20.91%
Advertisement
Diversification
OAKM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
52.34%
BMVP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.43%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
OAKM
Citigroup, Inc.
4.09%
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.
4.00%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
3.89%
State Street Corp.
3.85%
Targa Resources Corp.
3.78%
Capital One Financial Corp.
3.56%
Corteva, Inc.
3.52%
Airbnb, Inc.
3.47%
Bank of America Corp.
3.42%
Elevance Health, Inc.
3.38%
Merck & Co., Inc.
3.35%
Willis Towers Watson Plc
3.12%
Salesforce, Inc.
3.03%
Fiserv, Inc.
2.95%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
2.93%
BMVP
NetApp, Inc.
2.64%
Cisco Systems, Inc.
2.60%
Jabil, Inc.
2.40%
Cummins, Inc.
2.26%
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
2.20%
Principal Financial Group, Inc.
2.12%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.08%
Synchrony Financial
2.05%
The Allstate Corp.
2.05%
Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
2.05%
Packaging Corporation of America
2.02%
3M Co.
2.01%
The Travelers Cos., Inc.
1.99%
Apple, Inc.
1.99%
CDW Corp.
1.96%
Frequently asked questions about OAKM and BMVP
How have the OAKM and BMVP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 30, 2026, OAKM is up 6.71% year-to-date (YTD), while BMVP has returned 10.15%. That puts BMVP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OAKM or BMVP?
Year-to-date, the OAKM ETF saw +$149M in flows, compared to -$4M for BMVP.
Which ETF is more volatile: OAKM or BMVP?
Over the past year, OAKM had a volatility of 13.55%, while BMVP experienced 9.98%.
Which ETF is bigger: OAKM or BMVP?
As of July 30, 2026, OAKM holds $1.16 B in assets under management (AUM), while BMVP manages $104.34 M.
What sectors do the OAKM and BMVP ETFs invest in?
OAKM leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, BMVP focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the OAKM ETF and BMVP ETF?
OAKM top holdings include Citigroup, Inc., Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. and Delta Air Lines, Inc.. BMVP holds in its top three: NetApp, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc. and Jabil, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: OAKM or BMVP?
OAKM holds 39 securities with 52.34% of its assets in the top 15. BMVP has 56 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.43%.
Advertisement
Latest news about OAKM & BMVP
Advertisement
Advertisement
