Open Now: The Global ETF Survey Take the Survey →

Advertisement
Advertisement

OAKMvsAUSFETF Comparison

ETF 1
OAKM

Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF

This fund is part of
US Large Cap Value
-0.05%
VS
ETF 2
AUSF

Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF

This fund is part of
US Multi-Factor
+0.18%

Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF (OAKM) belongs to the US Large Cap Value segment. Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. OAKM's top 3 sector exposures are Finance, Healthcare and Technology. In contrast, AUSF's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Healthcare. OAKM is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.64%, versus 0.27% for AUSF. OAKM is up 6.43% year-to-date (YTD) with +$129M in YTD flows. AUSF performs better with 12.65% YTD performance, and +$70M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of OAKM and AUSF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.

Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios.  Discover our library of Model portfolios

OAKM vs AUSF performance and flow charts

Performance

0.02.04.06.08.0%Jun 30Jul 7Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28

Cumulative Flows

0 M10 M20 M30 MJun 30Jul 7Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28

Get all the metrics on this page, and more, through a reliable ETF data feed

Daily, global ETF data for advanced analysis or integration into apps (API), from our partner Trackinsight.

Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/31/2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y5Y
Perf.
OAKM
AUSF
+5.37%+4.60%
+6.78%+5.16%
+6.43%+12.65%
+17.51%+19.13%
n/a+68.25%
n/a+97.43%
Flows
OAKM
AUSF
+$13M+$10M
-$46M-$4M
+$129M+$70M
+$420M+$132M
-+$535M
-+$523M
Volatility and drawdown
3M1Y3Y5Y
Volatility
OAKM
AUSF
+13.02%+10.90%
+13.52%+10.09%
n/a+12.67%
n/a+13.65%
Max drawdown
OAKM
AUSF
-2.71%-3.23%
-7.12%-5.65%
n/a-12.33%
n/a-14.13%
Max drawdown duration
OAKM
AUSF
24d22d
174d101d
n/a204d
n/a215d
Trading data

Create an account to view trading data

Join for free
OAKM
AUSF
Last sale
8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
$30.42
$51.83
Previous close
07/31/2026
$30.17
$51.54
Consolidated volume
07/31/2026
Average volume
30 days
Average discount or premium
30 days
Average Bid/Ask spread
30 days
Replication quality
Data as of July 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference

Create an account to view replication metrics

Join for free

OAKM
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an index

Create an account to view replication quality

Join for free
OAKM
AUSF
Tracking error
Tracking difference
1 year cumulative return difference
Best
Worst
Daily return difference
Average
Worst
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 8/3/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
OAKM
AUSF
Last price
$30.42
$51.83
1D performance
+0.83%
+0.56%
AuM$1.13 B$901.95 M
E/R0.64%0.27%
Characteristics
OAKM
AUSF
Management strategyActivePassive
ProviderOakmark FundsGlobal X
Benchmark-Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index
N° of holdings38191
Asset class-Equities
Trailing 12m distribution yield
Join
Join
Inception dateDecember 2, 2024August 24, 2018
ESGNoNo
Advertisement
Exposure

Countries

OAKM
USA
92.58%
Other
7.42%
AUSF
USA
94.6%
Other
5.4%

Sectors

OAKM
Finance
39.93%
Healthcare
13.47%
Technology
9.42%
Energy
7.96%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.04%
Other
22.17%
AUSF
Finance
24.6%
Technology
13.8%
Healthcare
11.51%
Industrials
10.48%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
10.13%
Other
29.48%
Advertisement

Diversification

OAKM

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

52.34%
AUSF

Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15

23.59%

Top 15 holdings

Data as of June 30, 2026
OAKM
Citigroup, Inc.
4.09%
Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc.
4.00%
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
3.89%
State Street Corp.
3.85%
Targa Resources Corp.
3.78%
Capital One Financial Corp.
3.56%
Corteva, Inc.
3.52%
Airbnb, Inc.
3.47%
Bank of America Corp.
3.42%
Elevance Health, Inc.
3.38%
Merck & Co., Inc.
3.35%
Willis Towers Watson Plc
3.12%
Salesforce, Inc.
3.03%
Fiserv, Inc.
2.95%
The Charles Schwab Corp.
2.93%
AUSF
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.97%
Verizon Communications, Inc.
1.91%
Royalty Pharma Plc
1.71%
Johnson & Johnson
1.71%
AT&T, Inc.
1.67%
Altria Group, Inc.
1.56%
Linde Plc
1.54%
Electronic Arts, Inc.
1.51%
Chart Industries, Inc.
1.50%
Waste Management, Inc.
1.44%
TXNM Energy, Inc.
1.44%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.43%
The TJX Cos., Inc.
1.42%
RTX Corp.
1.41%
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
1.39%
Frequently asked questions about OAKM and AUSF

How have the OAKM and AUSF ETFs performed in 2026?

As of July 31, 2026, OAKM is up 6.43% year-to-date (YTD), while AUSF has returned 12.65%. That puts AUSF better performer ahead so far this year.

Which ETF is attracting more investor money: OAKM or AUSF?

Year-to-date, the OAKM ETF saw +$129M in flows, compared to +$70M for AUSF.

Which ETF is more volatile: OAKM or AUSF?

Over the past year, OAKM had a volatility of 13.52%, while AUSF experienced 10.09%.

Which ETF is bigger: OAKM or AUSF?

As of July 31, 2026, OAKM holds $1.13 B in assets under management (AUM), while AUSF manages $901.95 M.

What sectors do the OAKM and AUSF ETFs invest in?

OAKM leans toward sectors like Finance, Healthcare and Technology. Meanwhile, AUSF focuses on Finance, Technology and Healthcare.

What are the top holdings of the OAKM ETF and AUSF ETF?

OAKM top holdings include Citigroup, Inc., Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc. and Delta Air Lines, Inc.. AUSF holds in its top three: Cisco Systems, Inc., Verizon Communications, Inc. and Royalty Pharma Plc.

Which ETF is more diversified: OAKM or AUSF?

OAKM holds 39 securities with 52.34% of its assets in the top 15. AUSF has 194 securities and a top 15 weight of 23.59%.

Advertisement
Latest news about OAKM & AUSF
Advertisement
Advertisement
The Active Trader Report

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up

Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.

Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up