NYMvsHTAXETF Comparison
AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and Nomura National High-Yield Municipal Bond ETF (HTAX) belong to the same industry segment: Municipal Bonds. Both ETFs have the same top 1 sector exposures: Municipal. NYM is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.27%, versus 0.49% for HTAX. NYM is down -0.49% year-to-date (YTD) with +$27M in YTD flows. HTAX performs worse with -2.07% YTD performance, and +$58M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NYM and HTAX below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NYM vs HTAX performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NYM HTAX | -0.08%-1.14% | -1.98%-5.11% | -0.49%-2.07% | n/a-1.66% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | NYM HTAX | -$73K+$30M | +$21M+$33M | +$27M+$58M | -+$61M | -- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NYM HTAX | +3.30%+6.81% | n/a+4.41% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | NYM HTAX | -3.71%-7.28% | n/a-8.03% | n/an/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NYM HTAX | 92d92d | n/a102d | n/an/a | n/an/a |
NYM | HTAX | |
Last sale 10/19/2026 at 1:30 PM | $24.30 | $23.24 |
| Previous close 10/16/2026 | $24.31 | $23.24 |
| Consolidated volume 10/16/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
NYM | HTAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $24.30 | $23.24 |
| 1D performance | -0.02% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $1.29 B | $88.05 M |
| E/R | 0.27% | 0.49% |
NYM | HTAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | AllianceBernstein | Nomura |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 167 | 101 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | November 7, 2025 | March 5, 2025 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
