Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NWLGvsIWFETF Comparison
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF (NWLG) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) belong to the same industry segment: US Large Cap Growth. NWLG's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. In contrast, IWF's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services. NWLG is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.18% for IWF. NWLG is down -6.05% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. IWF performs worse with -6.31% YTD performance, and -$3.44B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NWLG and IWF below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NWLG vs IWF performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NWLG IWF | -2.14%-1.24% | -7.01%-5.86% | -6.05%-6.31% | +17.63%+20.94% | +89.98%+99.98% | n/a+89.68% |
| Flows | NWLG IWF | -+$604M | +$376K-$2.36B | --$3.44B | +$737K-$1.54B | +$2M-$514M | --$1.29B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NWLG IWF | +15.35%+15.86% | +22.85%+22.65% | +19.82%+19.06% | n/a+21.42% |
| Max drawdown | NWLG IWF | -8.50%-7.72% | -16.43%-15.75% | -23.90%-23.36% | n/a-32.75% |
| Max drawdown duration | NWLG IWF | 73d77d | 45d45d | 153d191d | n/a743d |
NWLG | IWF | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.06 | $438.29 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $35.69 | $443.30 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NWLG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NWLG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.06 | $438.29 |
| 1D performance | -1.77% | -1.13% |
| AuM | $11.06 M | $114.85 B |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.18% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NWLG and IWF ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, NWLG is down -6.05% year-to-date (YTD), while IWF has lost -6.31%. That puts NWLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NWLG or IWF?
Year-to-date, the NWLG ETF saw - in flows, compared to -$3.44B for IWF.
Which ETF is more volatile: NWLG or IWF?
Over the past year, NWLG had a volatility of 22.85%, while IWF experienced 22.65%.
Which ETF is bigger: NWLG or IWF?
As of March 11, 2026, NWLG holds $11.06 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWF manages $114.85 B.
What sectors do the NWLG and IWF ETFs invest in?
NWLG leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWF focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services.
What are the top holdings of the NWLG ETF and IWF ETF?
NWLG top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. IWF holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: NWLG or IWF?
NWLG holds 39 securities with 73.13% of its assets in the top 15. IWF has 391 securities and a top 15 weight of 66.22%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
