Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NSCRvsFQALETF Comparison
Nuveen Sustainable Core Equity ETF (NSCR) belongs to the Multiple Trends segment. Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. NSCR's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, FQAL's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. NSCR is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.45%, versus 0.15% for FQAL. NSCR is down -3.86% year-to-date (YTD) with - in YTD flows. FQAL performs better with -0.28% YTD performance, and +$8M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NSCR and FQAL below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NSCR vs FQAL performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NSCR FQAL | -3.92%-2.40% | -4.16%-0.98% | -3.86%-0.28% | +16.38%+19.55% | n/a+75.31% | n/a+79.81% |
| Flows | NSCR FQAL | -+$108K | -+$12M | -+$8M | +$294K-$51M | -+$527M | -+$616M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NSCR FQAL | +12.99%+11.27% | +18.97%+16.74% | n/a+13.95% | n/a+16.21% |
| Max drawdown | NSCR FQAL | -6.66%-2.75% | -14.33%-12.41% | n/a-16.70% | n/a-25.39% |
| Max drawdown duration | NSCR FQAL | 57d14d | 48d45d | n/a126d | n/a750d |
NSCR | FQAL | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $29.32 | $74.29 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $29.82 | $75.39 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NSCR | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NSCR | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $29.32 | $74.29 |
| 1D performance | -1.67% | -1.46% |
| AuM | $6.58 M | $1.15 B |
| E/R | 0.45% | 0.15% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NSCR and FQAL ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, NSCR is down -3.86% year-to-date (YTD), while FQAL has lost -0.28%. That puts FQAL better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NSCR or FQAL?
Year-to-date, the NSCR ETF saw - in flows, compared to +$8M for FQAL.
Which ETF is more volatile: NSCR or FQAL?
Over the past year, NSCR had a volatility of 18.97%, while FQAL experienced 16.74%.
Which ETF is bigger: NSCR or FQAL?
As of March 10, 2026, NSCR holds $6.58 M in assets under management (AUM), while FQAL manages $1.15 B.
What sectors do the NSCR and FQAL ETFs invest in?
NSCR leans toward sectors like Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. Meanwhile, FQAL focuses on Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the NSCR ETF and FQAL ETF?
NSCR top holdings include MICROSOFT-T, APPLE and NVIDIA. FQAL holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: NSCR or FQAL?
NSCR holds 53 securities with 54.55% of its assets in the top 15. FQAL has 124 securities and a top 15 weight of 45.59%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
