NLRvsSETMETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Sprott Energy Transition Materials ETF (SETM) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. NLR's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. In contrast, SETM's top sector exposures are Materials, Energy and Industrials. NLR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.65% for SETM. NLR is up 16.77% year-to-date (YTD) with +$937M in YTD flows. SETM performs better with 26.27% YTD performance, and +$284M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NLR and SETM below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NLR vs SETM performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NLR SETM | +9.25%+15.12% | -3.56%-4.22% | +16.77%+26.27% | +88.88%+157.43% | +182.68%+128.08% | +206.11%n/a |
| Flows | NLR SETM | +$145M+$33M | +$689M+$157M | +$937M+$284M | +$3.01B+$447M | +$4.06B+$482M | +$4.09B- |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NLR SETM | +41.43%+46.65% | +36.55%+34.79% | +30.16%+29.88% | +25.69%n/a |
| Max drawdown | NLR SETM | -21.18%-23.48% | -25.64%-23.48% | -29.79%-41.59% | -29.79%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NLR SETM | 86d86d | 104d86d | 116d427d | 116dn/a |
Trading data
NLR | SETM | |
Last sale 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM | $143.77 | $36.42 |
| Previous close 04/24/2026 | $146.35 | $36.87 |
| Consolidated volume 04/24/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NLR | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/24/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NLR | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $143.77 | $36.42 |
| 1D performance | -1.76% | -1.22% |
| AuM | $5.14 B | $606.96 M |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.65% |
Characteristics
NLR | SETM | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Passive | Passive |
| Provider | VanEck | Sprott ETFs |
| Benchmark | MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index | Nasdaq Sprott Energy Transition Materials Index |
| N° of holdings | 22 | 71 |
| Asset class | Equities | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | August 13, 2007 | February 1, 2023 |
| ESG | No | Yes |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NLR
USA
48.48%
Canada
21.11%
Other
30.4%
SETM
Canada
29.53%
USA
26.15%
Australia
24.33%
Other
19.99%
Sectors
NLR
Energy
36.75%
Utilities
35.57%
Industrials
15.84%
Other
11.83%
SETM
Materials
61.9%
Energy
19.79%
Other
18.31%
Advertisement
Diversification
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.2%
SETM
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
57.85%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
NLR
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP
8.73%
CAMECO
7.83%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC
6.45%
PUBLIC SRVCE ENT
6.33%
PG&E
5.73%
FORTUM
5.27%
CGN POWER CO LTD
5.07%
US63253R2013
4.74%
CEZ
4.44%
URANIUM ENERGY
4.37%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
4.24%
PALADIN ENERGY
4.23%
DENISON MINES
4.08%
ENERGY FUELS
4.05%
NUSCALE POWER CORPORATION
3.63%
SETM
US63253R2013
5.55%
ALBEMARLE
5.44%
LYNAS RARE EARTHS LIMITED
5.43%
FREEPORT-MCMORAN INC
5.38%
PILBARA MINERALS
5.24%
CAMECO
4.83%
FIRST MAJESTIC SILVER
4.13%
URANIUM ENERGY
3.55%
MP MATERIALS CORPORATION
3.07%
TECK RESOURCES LIMITED
2.73%
PALADIN ENERGY
2.66%
LUNDIN MINING
2.61%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
2.47%
ANTOFAGASTA
2.45%
DENISON MINES
2.31%
Frequently asked questions about NLR and SETM
How have the NLR and SETM ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, NLR is up 16.77% year-to-date (YTD), while SETM has returned 26.27%. That puts SETM better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NLR or SETM?
Year-to-date, the NLR ETF saw +$937M in flows, compared to +$284M for SETM.
Which ETF is more volatile: NLR or SETM?
Over the past year, NLR had a volatility of 36.55%, while SETM experienced 34.79%.
Which ETF is bigger: NLR or SETM?
As of April 24, 2026, NLR holds $5.14 B in assets under management (AUM), while SETM manages $606.96 M.
What sectors do the NLR and SETM ETFs invest in?
NLR leans toward sectors like Energy, Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, SETM focuses on Materials and Energy.
What are the top holdings of the NLR ETF and SETM ETF?
NLR top holdings include CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP, CAMECO and BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC. SETM holds in its top three: US63253R2013, ALBEMARLE and LYNAS RARE EARTHS LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: NLR or SETM?
NLR holds 25 securities with 79.2% of its assets in the top 15. SETM has 85 securities and a top 15 weight of 57.85%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NLR & SETM
There’s an ETF for That? Rare Earth Metals
December 19, 2025
SETM
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
How to Invest in AI's Demand for Energy
July 10, 2024
NLR
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
NLR
Advertisement
