NLRvsLITETF Comparison
VS
VanEck Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) and Global X Lithium & Battery ETF (LIT) belong to the same industry segment: Alternative Energy. NLR's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Utilities and Industrials. In contrast, LIT's top sector exposures are Materials, Industrials and Information Technology. NLR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.56%, versus 0.75% for LIT. NLR is up 18.53% year-to-date (YTD) with +$937M in YTD flows. LIT performs better with 29.5% YTD performance, and +$54M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NLR and LIT below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NLR vs LIT performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NLR LIT | +12.82%+15.08% | -4.86%+12.88% | +18.53%+29.50% | +90.15%+131.50% | +184.35%+43.63% | +210.61%+38.68% |
| Flows | NLR LIT | +$139M+$18M | +$666M+$10M | +$937M+$54M | +$3.01B+$62M | +$4.06B-$1.32B | +$4.09B-$813M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NLR LIT | +41.11%+29.87% | +36.64%+26.34% | +30.20%+25.50% | +25.70%+26.08% |
| Max drawdown | NLR LIT | -21.18%-10.62% | -25.64%-10.62% | -29.79%-51.18% | -29.79%-64.51% |
| Max drawdown duration | NLR LIT | 89d41d | 104d41d | 116d895d | 116d1618d |
Trading data
NLR | LIT | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $141.09 | $83.77 |
| Previous close 04/27/2026 | $146.86 | $84.95 |
| Consolidated volume 04/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NLR | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NLR | LIT | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $141.09 | $83.77 |
| 1D performance | -3.93% | -1.39% |
| AuM | $5.22 B | $1.98 B |
| E/R | 0.56% | 0.75% |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NLR
USA
48.48%
Canada
21.11%
Other
30.4%
LIT
USA
36.65%
China
33.92%
Republic of Korea
10.68%
Australia
8.81%
Other
9.94%
Sectors
NLR
Energy
36.75%
Utilities
35.57%
Industrials
15.84%
Other
11.83%
LIT
Materials
32.31%
Industrials
18.91%
Information Techn.
12.01%
Consumer Discreti.
9.95%
Other
26.82%
Advertisement
Diversification
NLR
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
79.2%
LIT
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
73.46%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
NLR
CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP
8.73%
CAMECO
7.83%
BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC
6.45%
PUBLIC SRVCE ENT
6.33%
PG&E
5.73%
FORTUM
5.27%
CGN POWER CO LTD
5.07%
US63253R2013
4.74%
CEZ
4.44%
URANIUM ENERGY
4.37%
NEXGEN ENERGY LTD
4.24%
PALADIN ENERGY
4.23%
DENISON MINES
4.08%
ENERGY FUELS
4.05%
NUSCALE POWER CORPORATION
3.63%
LIT
US7672041008
20.40%
ALBEMARLE
7.37%
SAMSUNG SDI
4.73%
PANASONIC HOLDINGS CORPORATION
4.25%
GANFENG LITHIUM
4.23%
US8336351056
4.07%
PILBARA MINERALS
3.96%
NAURA TECHNOLOGY GROUP CO LTD
3.78%
AMPEREX TECH
3.70%
BYD
3.17%
EVE ENERGY
2.91%
TIANQI LITHIUM
2.82%
LG ENERGY SOLUTION LTD
2.76%
TINCI MATERIALS
2.70%
TDK
2.61%
Frequently asked questions about NLR and LIT
How have the NLR and LIT ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 27, 2026, NLR is up 18.53% year-to-date (YTD), while LIT has returned 29.5%. That puts LIT better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NLR or LIT?
Year-to-date, the NLR ETF saw +$937M in flows, compared to +$54M for LIT.
Which ETF is more volatile: NLR or LIT?
Over the past year, NLR had a volatility of 36.64%, while LIT experienced 26.34%.
Which ETF is bigger: NLR or LIT?
As of April 27, 2026, NLR holds $5.22 B in assets under management (AUM), while LIT manages $1.98 B.
What sectors do the NLR and LIT ETFs invest in?
NLR leans toward sectors like Energy, Utilities and Industrials. Meanwhile, LIT focuses on Materials, Industrials and Information Technology.
What are the top holdings of the NLR ETF and LIT ETF?
NLR top holdings include CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORP, CAMECO and BWX TECHNOLOGIES INC. LIT holds in its top three: US7672041008, ALBEMARLE and SAMSUNG SDI.
Which ETF is more diversified: NLR or LIT?
NLR holds 25 securities with 79.2% of its assets in the top 15. LIT has 36 securities and a top 15 weight of 73.46%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NLR & LIT
ETF Comparison: Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) Versus VanEck Uranium + Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR)
December 17, 2025
NLR
3 Thematic ETF Segments to Watch in 2025
February 4, 2025
NLR
Donald Trump’s Executive Orders: ETF Bulls and Bears
January 24, 2025
NLR
Advertisement
There's an ETF for that? The 3 Best ETFs for Investing in Uranium
January 11, 2024
LIT
Is there a lithium boom on the horizon?
November 7, 2022
LIT
Advertisement
