NJANvsJEPQETF Comparison
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January
Innovator Growth-100 Power Buffer ETF - January (NJAN) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) belong to the same industry segment: Options Strategies. NJAN is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.79%, versus 0.35% for JEPQ. NJAN is up 9.91% year-to-date (YTD) with +$17M in YTD flows. JEPQ performs better with 10.72% YTD performance, and +$10.33B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NJAN and JEPQ below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NJAN vs JEPQ performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NJAN JEPQ | +0.83%+0.51% | +2.78%+2.60% | +9.91%+10.72% | +13.67%+15.71% | +47.31%+71.07% | +44.18%n/a |
| Flows | NJAN JEPQ | -$20M+$1.45B | -$26M+$3.86B | +$17M+$10.33B | -$2M+$11.72B | +$154M+$33.68B | +$150M- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NJAN JEPQ | +5.65%+13.96% | +7.45%+14.95% | +9.26%+15.77% | +12.67%n/a |
| Max drawdown | NJAN JEPQ | -2.14%-5.97% | -5.84%-8.85% | -12.97%-20.17% | -20.49%n/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NJAN JEPQ | 10d13d | 75d76d | 103d169d | 750dn/a |
NJAN | JEPQ | |
Last sale 10/16/2026 at 1:30 PM | $60.32 | $58.81 |
| Previous close 10/15/2026 | $60.74 | $60.10 |
| Consolidated volume 10/15/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
NJAN | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $60.32 | $58.81 |
| 1D performance | -0.69% | -2.15% |
| AuM | $336.18 M | $43.34 B |
| E/R | 0.79% | 0.35% |
NJAN | JEPQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Innovator | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | - | - |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | January 1, 2020 | May 3, 2022 |
| ESG | No | No |
