NBJPvsIPACETF Comparison
VS
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP) belongs to the Japan Blended Cap segment. iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) is part of the DM Blended Cap segment. NBJP's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Finance and Technology. In contrast, IPAC's top sector exposures are Finance, Technology and Industrials. NBJP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.92%, versus 0.09% for IPAC. NBJP is up 14.83% year-to-date (YTD) with +$59M in YTD flows. IPAC performs better with 16.11% YTD performance, and +$211M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NBJP and IPAC below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NBJP vs IPAC performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NBJP IPAC | -0.98%-1.18% | +0.28%+2.71% | +14.83%+16.11% | +18.70%+16.04% | n/a+75.35% | n/a+50.35% |
| Flows | NBJP IPAC | +$880K-$8M | -$4M+$17M | +$59M+$211M | +$73M+$455M | -+$186M | -+$916M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NBJP IPAC | +20.30%+15.33% | +23.36%+17.87% | n/a+16.97% | n/a+16.72% |
| Max drawdown | NBJP IPAC | -6.52%-4.79% | -14.65%-11.30% | n/a-15.72% | n/a-27.32% |
| Max drawdown duration | NBJP IPAC | 75d54d | 71d121d | n/a225d | n/a843d |
Trading data
NBJP | IPAC | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.09 | $83.95 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $35.11 | $83.95 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NBJP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexNBJP | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NBJP | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.09 | $83.95 |
| 1D performance | -0.04% | +0.00% |
| AuM | $124.47 M | $2.71 B |
| E/R | 1.92% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
NBJP | IPAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Neuberger Berman | iShares |
| Benchmark | - | MSCI Pacific IMI Index |
| N° of holdings | 58 | 1334 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 12, 2024 | June 10, 2014 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NBJP
Japan
99.16%
Other
0.84%
IPAC
Japan
69.43%
Australia
19.43%
Other
11.14%
Sectors
NBJP
Industrials
25.31%
Finance
24.82%
Technology
17.59%
Consumer Cyclical.
14.64%
Other
17.66%
IPAC
Finance
28.46%
Technology
16.54%
Industrials
15%
Non-Energy Materi.
10.23%
Consumer Cyclical.
7.67%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
7.23%
Other
14.87%
Advertisement
Diversification
NBJP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.95%
IPAC
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
24.8%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
NBJP
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
5.11%
Resona Holdings, Inc.
5.00%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
4.43%
Sysmex Corp.
4.20%
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
3.80%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.12%
Toyota Tsusho Corp.
3.03%
Niterra Co., Ltd.
2.89%
AMADA Co., Ltd.
2.60%
Kinden Corp.
2.47%
FANUC Corp.
2.36%
Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd.
2.33%
USS Co., Ltd.
2.21%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.20%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.19%
IPAC
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
2.56%
BHP Group Ltd.
2.51%
Commonwealth Bank of Australia
1.99%
Toyota Motor Corp.
1.95%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
1.66%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
1.65%
Advantest Corp.
1.61%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.58%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.57%
Sony Group Corp.
1.53%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.31%
DBS Group Holdings Ltd.
1.30%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.26%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
1.25%
AIA Group Ltd.
1.06%
Frequently asked questions about NBJP and IPAC
How have the NBJP and IPAC ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, NBJP is up 14.83% year-to-date (YTD), while IPAC has returned 16.11%. That puts IPAC better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NBJP or IPAC?
Year-to-date, the NBJP ETF saw +$59M in flows, compared to +$211M for IPAC.
Which ETF is more volatile: NBJP or IPAC?
Over the past year, NBJP had a volatility of 23.36%, while IPAC experienced 17.87%.
Which ETF is bigger: NBJP or IPAC?
As of October 27, 2026, NBJP holds $124.47 M in assets under management (AUM), while IPAC manages $2.71 B.
What sectors do the NBJP and IPAC ETFs invest in?
NBJP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Finance and Technology. Meanwhile, IPAC focuses on Finance, Technology and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the NBJP ETF and IPAC ETF?
NBJP top holdings include Mizuho Financial Group, Inc., Resona Holdings, Inc. and Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.. IPAC holds in its top three: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., BHP Group Ltd. and Commonwealth Bank of Australia.
Which ETF is more diversified: NBJP or IPAC?
NBJP holds 58 securities with 47.95% of its assets in the top 15. IPAC has 1335 securities and a top 15 weight of 24.8%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NBJP & IPAC
Advertisement
