NBJPvsFLJPETF Comparison
VS
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. NBJP's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, FLJP's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. NBJP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.92%, versus 0.09% for FLJP. NBJP is up 11.92% year-to-date (YTD) with +$64M in YTD flows. FLJP performs worse with 11.68% YTD performance, and +$991M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NBJP and FLJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NBJP vs FLJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/28/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NBJP FLJP | -6.53%-3.08% | -0.17%+1.59% | +11.92%+11.68% | +26.14%+24.66% | n/a+55.98% | n/a+52.36% |
| Flows | NBJP FLJP | -$5M+$121M | -$4M+$263M | +$64M+$991M | +$81M+$1.22B | -+$1.53B | -+$2.60B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NBJP FLJP | +26.42%+22.48% | +22.81%+21.30% | n/a+21.77% | n/a+20.43% |
| Max drawdown | NBJP FLJP | -10.85%-6.50% | -14.65%-13.65% | n/a-18.71% | n/a-33.12% |
| Max drawdown duration | NBJP FLJP | 36d35d | 71d110d | n/a235d | n/a903d |
Trading data
NBJP | FLJP | |
Last sale 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM | $33.92 | $38.25 |
| Previous close 07/28/2026 | $34.52 | $38.45 |
| Consolidated volume 07/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NBJP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexNBJP | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/29/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NBJP | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $33.92 | $38.25 |
| 1D performance | -1.73% | -0.52% |
| AuM | $125.62 M | $3.79 B |
| E/R | 1.92% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
NBJP | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Neuberger Berman | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 60 | 475 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 12, 2024 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NBJP
Japan
96.66%
Other
3.34%
FLJP
Japan
100%
Other
-0%
Sectors
NBJP
Technology
25.41%
Industrials
24.7%
Finance
19.81%
Consumer Cyclical.
12.3%
Other
17.77%
FLJP
Technology
24.4%
Finance
19.44%
Industrials
18.45%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.93%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.06%
Other
19.72%
Advertisement
Diversification
NBJP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.16%
FLJP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.32%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
NBJP
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
4.78%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
4.01%
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
4.00%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
3.93%
IBIDEN Co., Ltd.
3.81%
Niterra Co., Ltd.
3.57%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
3.17%
Ebara Corp.
3.03%
AMADA Co., Ltd.
2.81%
Kinden Corp.
2.64%
Resona Holdings, Inc.
2.48%
Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd.
2.47%
FANUC Corp.
2.42%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
2.04%
TDK Corp.
2.00%
FLJP
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
3.57%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
3.25%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.00%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
2.93%
SoftBank Group Corp.
2.37%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.33%
Advantest Corp.
2.32%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.00%
Sony Group Corp.
1.91%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.88%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.86%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.55%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.49%
KEYENCE Corp.
1.46%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.41%
Frequently asked questions about NBJP and FLJP
How have the NBJP and FLJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 28, 2026, NBJP is up 11.92% year-to-date (YTD), while FLJP has returned 11.68%. That puts NBJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NBJP or FLJP?
Year-to-date, the NBJP ETF saw +$64M in flows, compared to +$991M for FLJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: NBJP or FLJP?
Over the past year, NBJP had a volatility of 22.81%, while FLJP experienced 21.3%.
Which ETF is bigger: NBJP or FLJP?
As of July 28, 2026, NBJP holds $125.62 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLJP manages $3.79 B.
What sectors do the NBJP and FLJP ETFs invest in?
NBJP leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, FLJP focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the NBJP ETF and FLJP ETF?
NBJP top holdings include Tokyo Electron Ltd., Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.. FLJP holds in its top three: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Tokyo Electron Ltd. and Toyota Motor Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: NBJP or FLJP?
NBJP holds 60 securities with 47.16% of its assets in the top 15. FLJP has 475 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.32%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NBJP & FLJP
Ask the Manager: Kei Okamura Breaks Down Japan’s Investment Case
February 27, 2025
NBJP
Japan ETFs Gain Amid Nikkei and TOPIX Surge in June
July 1, 2024
FLJP
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Japanese Equity ETFs
April 5, 2024
FLJP
Advertisement
Advertisement
