NBJPvsFLJPETF Comparison
VS
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. NBJP's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Finance and Technology. In contrast, FLJP's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. NBJP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.92%, versus 0.09% for FLJP. NBJP is up 14.83% year-to-date (YTD) with +$59M in YTD flows. FLJP performs better with 17.17% YTD performance, and +$1.26B in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NBJP and FLJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NBJP vs FLJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 10/27/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NBJP FLJP | -0.98%-2.53% | +0.28%+1.92% | +14.83%+17.17% | +18.70%+17.49% | n/a+76.27% | n/a+56.36% |
| Flows | NBJP FLJP | +$880K+$222M | -$4M+$295M | +$59M+$1.26B | +$73M+$1.45B | -+$1.83B | -+$2.65B |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NBJP FLJP | +20.30%+17.31% | +23.36%+21.47% | n/a+21.80% | n/a+20.48% |
| Max drawdown | NBJP FLJP | -6.52%-5.48% | -14.65%-13.65% | n/a-18.71% | n/a-29.22% |
| Max drawdown duration | NBJP FLJP | 75d21d | 71d110d | n/a235d | n/a817d |
Trading data
NBJP | FLJP | |
Last sale 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.09 | $40.43 |
| Previous close 10/27/2026 | $35.11 | $40.55 |
| Consolidated volume 10/27/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of September 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NBJP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexNBJP | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 10/28/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NBJP | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.09 | $40.43 |
| 1D performance | -0.04% | -0.30% |
| AuM | $124.47 M | $4.24 B |
| E/R | 1.92% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
NBJP | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Neuberger Berman | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 58 | 474 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 12, 2024 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NBJP
Japan
99.16%
Other
0.84%
FLJP
Japan
100%
Other
-0%
Sectors
NBJP
Industrials
25.31%
Finance
24.82%
Technology
17.59%
Consumer Cyclical.
14.64%
Other
17.66%
FLJP
Technology
22.44%
Finance
20.61%
Industrials
18.76%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.97%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.3%
Other
19.92%
Advertisement
Diversification
NBJP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.95%
FLJP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
32.41%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of August 31, 2026
NBJP
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
5.11%
Resona Holdings, Inc.
5.00%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
4.43%
Sysmex Corp.
4.20%
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
3.80%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.12%
Toyota Tsusho Corp.
3.03%
Niterra Co., Ltd.
2.89%
AMADA Co., Ltd.
2.60%
Kinden Corp.
2.47%
FANUC Corp.
2.36%
Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd.
2.33%
USS Co., Ltd.
2.21%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.20%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.19%
FLJP
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
3.85%
Toyota Motor Corp.
3.25%
Advantest Corp.
2.49%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.41%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
2.41%
Hitachi Ltd.
2.31%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
2.30%
Sony Group Corp.
2.27%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.93%
SoftBank Group Corp.
1.92%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
1.55%
KEYENCE Corp.
1.51%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.47%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
1.42%
ITOCHU Corp.
1.33%
Frequently asked questions about NBJP and FLJP
How have the NBJP and FLJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of October 27, 2026, NBJP is up 14.83% year-to-date (YTD), while FLJP has returned 17.17%. That puts FLJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NBJP or FLJP?
Year-to-date, the NBJP ETF saw +$59M in flows, compared to +$1.26B for FLJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: NBJP or FLJP?
Over the past year, NBJP had a volatility of 23.36%, while FLJP experienced 21.47%.
Which ETF is bigger: NBJP or FLJP?
As of October 27, 2026, NBJP holds $124.47 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLJP manages $4.24 B.
What sectors do the NBJP and FLJP ETFs invest in?
NBJP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Finance and Technology. Meanwhile, FLJP focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the NBJP ETF and FLJP ETF?
NBJP top holdings include Mizuho Financial Group, Inc., Resona Holdings, Inc. and Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.. FLJP holds in its top three: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Toyota Motor Corp. and Advantest Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: NBJP or FLJP?
NBJP holds 58 securities with 47.95% of its assets in the top 15. FLJP has 474 securities and a top 15 weight of 32.41%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NBJP & FLJP
Ask the Manager: Kei Okamura Breaks Down Japan’s Investment Case
February 27, 2025
NBJP
Japan ETFs Gain Amid Nikkei and TOPIX Surge in June
July 1, 2024
FLJP
Tony's ETF Buyers Guide: Japanese Equity ETFs
April 5, 2024
FLJP
Advertisement
Advertisement
