NBJPvsFLJHETF Comparison
VS
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. NBJP's top 3 sector exposures are Technology, Industrials and Finance. In contrast, FLJH's top sector exposures are Technology, Finance and Industrials. NBJP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.92%, versus 0.09% for FLJH. NBJP is up 10.64% year-to-date (YTD) with +$64M in YTD flows. FLJH performs better with 19.15% YTD performance, and +$47M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NBJP and FLJH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NBJP vs FLJH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 07/29/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NBJP FLJH | -7.60%-1.52% | +0.33%+5.22% | +10.64%+19.15% | +24.47%+43.73% | n/a+104.83% | n/a+169.99% |
| Flows | NBJP FLJH | -$5M+$9M | -$4M+$27M | +$64M+$47M | +$81M+$54M | --$106M | -+$120M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NBJP FLJH | +26.31%+22.20% | +22.85%+20.53% | n/a+21.50% | n/a+19.44% |
| Max drawdown | NBJP FLJH | -11.88%-5.44% | -14.65%-11.13% | n/a-25.01% | n/a-25.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | NBJP FLJH | 37d36d | 71d71d | n/a321d | n/a321d |
Trading data
NBJP | FLJH | |
Last sale 7/30/2026 at 1:30 PM | $35.35 | $44.69 |
| Previous close 07/29/2026 | $33.92 | $44.08 |
| Consolidated volume 07/29/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of June 30, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NBJP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexNBJP | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 7/30/2026 at 1:30 PM
Live
Closed
NBJP | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $35.35 | $44.69 |
| 1D performance | +4.22% | +1.38% |
| AuM | $124.18 M | $177.36 M |
| E/R | 1.92% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
NBJP | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Neuberger Berman | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 60 | 474 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 12, 2024 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NBJP
Japan
96.66%
Other
3.34%
FLJH
Japan
100%
Other
0%
Sectors
NBJP
Technology
25.41%
Industrials
24.7%
Finance
19.81%
Consumer Cyclical.
12.3%
Other
17.77%
FLJH
Technology
24.81%
Finance
19.28%
Industrials
18.39%
Consumer Cyclical.
9.92%
Consumer Non-Cycl.
8.01%
Other
19.6%
Advertisement
Diversification
NBJP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
47.16%
FLJH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
33.49%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of June 30, 2026
NBJP
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
4.78%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
4.01%
Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.
4.00%
Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc.
3.93%
IBIDEN Co., Ltd.
3.81%
Niterra Co., Ltd.
3.57%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
3.17%
Ebara Corp.
3.03%
AMADA Co., Ltd.
2.81%
Kinden Corp.
2.64%
Resona Holdings, Inc.
2.48%
Sumitomo Realty & Development Co., Ltd.
2.47%
FANUC Corp.
2.42%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
2.04%
TDK Corp.
2.00%
FLJH
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
3.57%
Tokyo Electron Ltd.
3.24%
Kioxia Holdings Corp.
3.12%
Toyota Motor Corp.
2.97%
Advantest Corp.
2.36%
SoftBank Group Corp.
2.36%
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
2.33%
Hitachi Ltd.
1.99%
Sony Group Corp.
1.91%
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
1.89%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc.
1.85%
Fast Retailing Co., Ltd.
1.54%
Recruit Holdings Co., Ltd.
1.50%
KEYENCE Corp.
1.46%
Mitsubishi Corp.
1.41%
Frequently asked questions about NBJP and FLJH
How have the NBJP and FLJH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of July 29, 2026, NBJP is up 10.64% year-to-date (YTD), while FLJH has returned 19.15%. That puts FLJH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NBJP or FLJH?
Year-to-date, the NBJP ETF saw +$64M in flows, compared to +$47M for FLJH.
Which ETF is more volatile: NBJP or FLJH?
Over the past year, NBJP had a volatility of 22.85%, while FLJH experienced 20.53%.
Which ETF is bigger: NBJP or FLJH?
As of July 29, 2026, NBJP holds $124.18 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLJH manages $177.36 M.
What sectors do the NBJP and FLJH ETFs invest in?
NBJP leans toward sectors like Technology, Industrials and Finance. Meanwhile, FLJH focuses on Technology, Finance and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the NBJP ETF and FLJH ETF?
NBJP top holdings include Tokyo Electron Ltd., Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. and Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd.. FLJH holds in its top three: Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., Tokyo Electron Ltd. and Kioxia Holdings Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: NBJP or FLJH?
NBJP holds 60 securities with 47.16% of its assets in the top 15. FLJH has 474 securities and a top 15 weight of 33.49%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NBJP & FLJH
Advertisement
