NBJPvsFLJHETF Comparison
VS
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP) and Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF (FLJH) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. Both ETFs have the same top 3 sector exposures: Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. NBJP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.92%, versus 0.09% for FLJH. NBJP is up 10.1% year-to-date (YTD) with +$67M in YTD flows. FLJH performs better with 13.25% YTD performance, and +$20M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NBJP and FLJH below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
Find out how industry players manage ETF portfolios. Discover our library of Model portfolios
NBJP vs FLJH performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
Historic performance and flows
Data as of 04/24/2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NBJP FLJH | +6.63%+7.40% | +3.25%+8.90% | +10.10%+13.25% | +34.49%+51.48% | n/a+123.29% | n/a+159.36% |
| Flows | NBJP FLJH | +$3M- | +$38M+$13M | +$67M+$20M | +$94M+$25M | -+$87M | -+$81M |
Volatility and drawdown
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NBJP FLJH | +28.10%+27.01% | +20.60%+18.41% | n/a+20.89% | n/a+19.14% |
| Max drawdown | NBJP FLJH | -14.65%-11.13% | -14.65%-11.13% | n/a-25.01% | n/a-25.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | NBJP FLJH | 54d58d | 54d58d | n/a321d | n/a321d |
Trading data
NBJP | FLJH | |
Last sale 4/28/2026 at 7:47 PM | $34.15 | $42.03 |
| Previous close 04/28/2026 | $33.92 | $42.12 |
| Consolidated volume 04/28/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Replication quality
Data as of March 31, 2026
1-year trailing difference
Create an account to view replication metrics
Join for free
NBJP
is actively managed and doesn’t replicate an indexNBJP | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
Advertisement
Main metrics
Last update 4/28/2026 at 7:47 PM
Live
Closed
NBJP | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $34.15 | $42.03 |
| 1D performance | +0.67% | -0.21% |
| AuM | $126.95 M | $144.21 M |
| E/R | 1.92% | 0.09% |
Characteristics
NBJP | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Neuberger Berman | Franklin Templeton |
| Benchmark | - | FTSE Japan RIC Capped Index |
| N° of holdings | 61 | 466 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 12, 2024 | November 2, 2017 |
| ESG | No | No |
Advertisement
Exposure
Countries
NBJP
Japan
97.76%
Other
2.24%
FLJH
Japan
100%
Other
0%
Sectors
NBJP
Industrials
31.17%
Consumer Discreti.
18.67%
Financials
15.16%
Information Techn.
12.84%
Real Estate
8%
Other
14.16%
FLJH
Industrials
26.26%
Consumer Discreti.
16.01%
Financials
15.68%
Information Techn.
12.76%
Other
29.29%
Advertisement
Diversification
NBJP
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
45.3%
FLJH
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
31.27%
Top 15 holdings
Data as of March 31, 2026
NBJP
TOKIO MARINE HOLDINGS
4.96%
MIZUHO FINANCIAL
4.00%
SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES
3.62%
SUMITOMO REALTY
3.57%
NGK SPARK PLUG
3.00%
TOKYO ELECTRON
2.90%
KINDEN
2.85%
TOYOTA
2.80%
TAISEI
2.77%
RESONA HOLDINGS
2.57%
TOKYU FUDOSAN HOLDINGS
2.54%
EBARA
2.49%
JP3480470008
2.44%
AMADA CO LTD
2.42%
MITSUI
2.39%
FLJH
TOYOTA
4.06%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP
3.35%
HITACHI
2.33%
SONY GROUP CORPORATION
2.19%
SUMITOMO MITSUI
2.16%
MITSUBISHI
2.09%
TOKYO ELECTRON
2.02%
ADVANTEST
1.87%
MITSUI
1.82%
MIZUHO FINANCIAL
1.74%
SOFTBANK GROUP CORP
1.69%
MITSUBISHI HVY
1.62%
TOKIO MARINE HOLDINGS
1.56%
ITOCHU
1.47%
SHIN-ETSU CHEM
1.31%
Frequently asked questions about NBJP and FLJH
How have the NBJP and FLJH ETFs performed in 2026?
As of April 24, 2026, NBJP is up 10.1% year-to-date (YTD), while FLJH has returned 13.25%. That puts FLJH better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NBJP or FLJH?
Year-to-date, the NBJP ETF saw +$67M in flows, compared to +$20M for FLJH.
Which ETF is more volatile: NBJP or FLJH?
Over the past year, NBJP had a volatility of 20.6%, while FLJH experienced 18.41%.
Which ETF is bigger: NBJP or FLJH?
As of April 24, 2026, NBJP holds $126.95 M in assets under management (AUM), while FLJH manages $144.21 M.
What sectors do the NBJP and FLJH ETFs invest in?
NBJP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Meanwhile, FLJH focuses on Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Financials.
What are the top holdings of the NBJP ETF and FLJH ETF?
NBJP top holdings include TOKIO MARINE HOLDINGS, MIZUHO FINANCIAL and SUMITOMO ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES. FLJH holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI.
Which ETF is more diversified: NBJP or FLJH?
NBJP holds 62 securities with 45.3% of its assets in the top 15. FLJH has 476 securities and a top 15 weight of 31.27%.
Advertisement
Latest news about NBJP & FLJH
Advertisement
