Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NBJPvsBBJPETF Comparison
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF (NBJP) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders Japan ETF (BBJP) belong to the same industry segment: Japan Blended Cap. NBJP's top 3 sector exposures are Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. In contrast, BBJP's top sector exposures are Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary. NBJP is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 1.92%, versus 0.19% for BBJP. NBJP is up 8.16% year-to-date (YTD) with +$63M in YTD flows. BBJP performs worse with 6.23% YTD performance, and +$453M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NBJP and BBJP below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NBJP vs BBJP performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NBJP BBJP | -6.05%-8.70% | +8.39%+5.76% | +8.16%+6.23% | +38.98%+31.65% | n/a+67.04% | n/a+43.73% |
| Flows | NBJP BBJP | +$27M+$542M | +$63M+$364M | +$63M+$453M | +$90M+$761M | -+$3.68B | -+$4.13B |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NBJP BBJP | +21.62%+21.02% | +19.95%+21.14% | n/a+18.34% | n/a+17.89% |
| Max drawdown | NBJP BBJP | -8.87%-9.83% | -13.15%-14.70% | n/a-15.55% | n/a-32.66% |
| Max drawdown duration | NBJP BBJP | 9d28d | 33d37d | n/a225d | n/a897d |
NBJP | BBJP | |
Last sale 3/12/2026 at 1:30 PM | $32.62 | $68.69 |
| Previous close 03/11/2026 | $33.33 | $69.96 |
| Consolidated volume 03/11/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NBJP | BBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NBJP | BBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $32.62 | $68.69 |
| 1D performance | -2.15% | -1.82% |
| AuM | $120.57 M | $15.35 B |
| E/R | 1.92% | 0.19% |
NBJP | BBJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Passive |
| Provider | Neuberger Berman | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Benchmark | - | Morningstar Japan Target Market Exposure Index |
| N° of holdings | 57 | 180 |
| Asset class | - | Equities |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | September 12, 2024 | June 18, 2018 |
| ESG | No | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NBJP and BBJP ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 10, 2026, NBJP is up 8.16% year-to-date (YTD), while BBJP has returned 6.23%. That puts NBJP better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NBJP or BBJP?
Year-to-date, the NBJP ETF saw +$63M in flows, compared to +$453M for BBJP.
Which ETF is more volatile: NBJP or BBJP?
Over the past year, NBJP had a volatility of 19.95%, while BBJP experienced 21.14%.
Which ETF is bigger: NBJP or BBJP?
As of March 10, 2026, NBJP holds $120.57 M in assets under management (AUM), while BBJP manages $15.35 B.
What sectors do the NBJP and BBJP ETFs invest in?
NBJP leans toward sectors like Industrials, Consumer Discretionary and Financials. Meanwhile, BBJP focuses on Industrials, Financials and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the NBJP ETF and BBJP ETF?
NBJP top holdings include MIZUHO FINANCIAL, UACJ CORP and SUMITOMO REALTY. BBJP holds in its top three: TOYOTA, MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP and HITACHI.
Which ETF is more diversified: NBJP or BBJP?
NBJP holds 58 securities with 44.06% of its assets in the top 15. BBJP has 180 securities and a top 15 weight of 36.95%.
Ask the Manager: Kei Okamura Breaks Down Japan’s Investment Case
Japan ETFs Gain Amid Nikkei and TOPIX Surge in June
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
