Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NBDSvsIWLGETF Comparison
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) belongs to the Disruptive Technology segment. NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth ETF (IWLG) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. NBDS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, IWLG's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. NBDS is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.85% for IWLG. NBDS is down -11.52% year-to-date (YTD) with +$872K in YTD flows. IWLG performs better with -9.13% YTD performance, and +$18M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NBDS and IWLG below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NBDS vs IWLG performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NBDS IWLG | +0.61%-2.24% | -12.03%-7.99% | -11.52%-9.13% | +14.89%+14.76% | +64.78%+90.74% | n/an/a |
| Flows | NBDS IWLG | -+$8M | +$2M+$45M | +$872K+$18M | +$3M+$560M | +$12M+$632M | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NBDS IWLG | +24.99%+15.72% | +29.28%+22.75% | +25.14%+19.82% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | NBDS IWLG | -17.12%-10.54% | -20.92%-16.14% | -28.33%-23.02% | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NBDS IWLG | 65d75d | 134d45d | 126d151d | n/an/a |
NBDS | IWLG | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.12 | $49.86 |
| Previous close 03/13/2026 | $31.34 | $49.26 |
| Consolidated volume 03/13/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
NBDS | IWLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.12 | $49.86 |
| 1D performance | -0.70% | +1.22% |
| AuM | $26.76 M | $621.78 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.85% |
NBDS | IWLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Neuberger Berman | New York Life Investments |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 22 | 37 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 6, 2022 | June 23, 2022 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NBDS and IWLG ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 12, 2026, NBDS is down -11.52% year-to-date (YTD), while IWLG has lost -9.13%. That puts IWLG better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NBDS or IWLG?
Year-to-date, the NBDS ETF saw +$872K in flows, compared to +$18M for IWLG.
Which ETF is more volatile: NBDS or IWLG?
Over the past year, NBDS had a volatility of 29.28%, while IWLG experienced 22.75%.
Which ETF is bigger: NBDS or IWLG?
As of March 12, 2026, NBDS holds $26.76 M in assets under management (AUM), while IWLG manages $621.78 M.
What sectors do the NBDS and IWLG ETFs invest in?
NBDS leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, IWLG focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the NBDS ETF and IWLG ETF?
NBDS top holdings include NVIDIA, ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES and INTUITIVE SURGICAL. IWLG holds in its top three: NVIDIA, APPLE and MICROSOFT-T.
Which ETF is more diversified: NBDS or IWLG?
NBDS holds 22 securities with 59.29% of its assets in the top 15. IWLG has 39 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.07%.
Active Trader Report: Use of Leveraged & Inverse ETFs Way Up
Direxion partnered with Compound Insights and Vanda to explore what’s driving the evolution of active trading — and how active traders are using leveraged and inverse funds across equities, single stocks, commodities, and volatility.
