Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NBDSvsGSGOETF Comparison
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) belongs to the Disruptive Technology segment. Goldman Sachs Growth Opportunities ETF (GSGO) is part of the US Multi-Factor segment. NBDS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, GSGO's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. NBDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.45% for GSGO. NBDS is down -9.32% year-to-date (YTD) with +$872K in YTD flows. GSGO performs better with -4.08% YTD performance, and -$5M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NBDS and GSGO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NBDS vs GSGO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NBDS GSGO | +0.31%-1.71% | -12.34%-5.22% | -9.32%-4.08% | +20.93%n/a | +68.88%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | NBDS GSGO | --$2M | +$2M-$7M | +$872K-$5M | +$3M- | +$12M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NBDS GSGO | +25.13%+16.70% | +29.29%n/a | +25.12%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | NBDS GSGO | -17.12%-6.94% | -20.92%n/a | -28.33%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NBDS GSGO | 64d73d | 133dn/a | 126dn/a | n/an/a |
NBDS | GSGO | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.12 | $37.40 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $31.34 | $37.75 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
NBDS | GSGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.12 | $37.40 |
| 1D performance | -0.70% | -0.91% |
| AuM | $27.43 M | $146.14 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.45% |
NBDS | GSGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Neuberger Berman | Goldman Sachs |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 22 | 48 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 6, 2022 | November 14, 2025 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NBDS and GSGO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, NBDS is down -9.32% year-to-date (YTD), while GSGO has lost -4.08%. That puts GSGO better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NBDS or GSGO?
Year-to-date, the NBDS ETF saw +$872K in flows, compared to -$5M for GSGO.
Which ETF is bigger: NBDS or GSGO?
As of March 11, 2026, NBDS holds $27.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while GSGO manages $146.14 M.
What sectors do the NBDS and GSGO ETFs invest in?
NBDS leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, GSGO focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the NBDS ETF and GSGO ETF?
NBDS top holdings include NVIDIA, ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES and INTUITIVE SURGICAL. GSGO holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: NBDS or GSGO?
NBDS holds 22 securities with 59.29% of its assets in the top 15. GSGO has 51 securities and a top 15 weight of 65.84%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
