Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NBDSvsAGRWETF Comparison
Neuberger Berman Disrupters ETF (NBDS) belongs to the Disruptive Technology segment. Allspring LT Large Growth ETF (AGRW) is part of the US Large Cap Growth segment. NBDS's top 3 sector exposures are Information Technology, Consumer Discretionary and Health Care. In contrast, AGRW's top sector exposures are Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary. NBDS is more expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.65%, versus 0.35% for AGRW. NBDS is down -9.32% year-to-date (YTD) with +$872K in YTD flows. AGRW performs better with -4.31% YTD performance, and -$24M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NBDS and AGRW below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NBDS vs AGRW performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NBDS AGRW | +0.31%-0.96% | -12.34%-5.72% | -9.32%-4.31% | +20.93%n/a | +68.88%n/a | n/an/a |
| Flows | NBDS AGRW | -- | +$2M-$24M | +$872K-$24M | +$3M- | +$12M- | -- |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NBDS AGRW | +25.13%+15.85% | +29.29%n/a | +25.12%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown | NBDS AGRW | -17.12%-7.51% | -20.92%n/a | -28.33%n/a | n/an/a |
| Max drawdown duration | NBDS AGRW | 64d63d | 133dn/a | 126dn/a | n/an/a |
NBDS | AGRW | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $31.12 | $27.96 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $31.34 | $28.37 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
NBDS | AGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $31.12 | $27.96 |
| 1D performance | -0.70% | -1.43% |
| AuM | $27.43 M | $100.64 M |
| E/R | 0.65% | 0.35% |
NBDS | AGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Management strategy | Active | Active |
| Provider | Neuberger Berman | Allspring |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| N° of holdings | 22 | 42 |
| Asset class | - | - |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | Join | Join |
| Inception date | April 6, 2022 | March 26, 2025 |
| ESG | Yes | No |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NBDS and AGRW ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 11, 2026, NBDS is down -9.32% year-to-date (YTD), while AGRW has lost -4.31%. That puts AGRW better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NBDS or AGRW?
Year-to-date, the NBDS ETF saw +$872K in flows, compared to -$24M for AGRW.
Which ETF is bigger: NBDS or AGRW?
As of March 11, 2026, NBDS holds $27.43 M in assets under management (AUM), while AGRW manages $100.64 M.
What sectors do the NBDS and AGRW ETFs invest in?
NBDS leans toward sectors like Information Technology and Consumer Discretionary. Meanwhile, AGRW focuses on Information Technology, Communication Services and Consumer Discretionary.
What are the top holdings of the NBDS ETF and AGRW ETF?
NBDS top holdings include NVIDIA, ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES and INTUITIVE SURGICAL. AGRW holds in its top three: NVIDIA, MICROSOFT-T and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: NBDS or AGRW?
NBDS holds 22 securities with 59.29% of its assets in the top 15. AGRW has 43 securities and a top 15 weight of 66.72%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
