Keep tabs on your favorite ETFs with a personalized weekly tracker. Create a Watchlist now →
NANRvsMOOETF Comparison
SPDR S&P North American Natural Resources ETF (NANR) and VanEck Agribusiness ETF (MOO) belong to the same industry segment: Natural Resources. NANR's top 3 sector exposures are Energy, Materials and Consumer Staples. In contrast, MOO's top sector exposures are Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials. NANR is less expensive with a Total Expense Ratio (TER) of 0.35%, versus 0.55% for MOO. NANR is up 19.99% year-to-date (YTD) with -$136M in YTD flows. MOO performs worse with 15.03% YTD performance, and +$299M in YTD flows. Run a side-by-side ETF comparison of NANR and MOO below, and assess how they stack up in performance, liquidity, risk, exposure, holdings, and more, helping you select the best ETF for your investments.
NANR vs MOO performance and flow charts
Performance
Cumulative Flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | NANR MOO | -0.37%-2.06% | +20.95%+15.35% | +19.99%+15.03% | +56.87%+25.31% | +69.99%+7.87% | +126.16%+6.97% |
| Flows | NANR MOO | -$126M+$44M | -$136M+$295M | -$136M+$299M | -$136M+$266M | -$288M-$224M | -$127M+$91M |
| 3M | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Volatility | NANR MOO | +23.32%+13.81% | +22.54%+15.71% | +19.61%+14.91% | +22.61%+16.35% |
| Max drawdown | NANR MOO | -5.48%-4.90% | -16.16%-12.71% | -18.22%-26.51% | -26.26%-39.01% |
| Max drawdown duration | NANR MOO | 11d20d | 65d43d | 200d1015d | 759d1421d |
NANR | MOO | |
Last sale 3/13/2026 at 1:30 PM | $81.42 | $83.54 |
| Previous close 03/12/2026 | $82.73 | $84.76 |
| Consolidated volume 03/12/2026 | ||
| Average volume 30 days | ||
| Average discount or premium 30 days | ||
| Average Bid/Ask spread 30 days |
Create an account to view replication metrics
NANR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Tracking error | ||
| Tracking difference | ||
| 1 year cumulative return difference | ||
| Best | ||
| Worst | ||
| Daily return difference | ||
| Average | ||
| Worst | ||
NANR | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Last price | $81.42 | $83.54 |
| 1D performance | -1.58% | -1.44% |
| AuM | $779.56 M | $970.45 M |
| E/R | 0.35% | 0.55% |
Countries
Sectors
Diversification
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Total weight of top 15 holdings out of 15
Top 15 holdings
How have the NANR and MOO ETFs performed in 2026?
As of March 13, 2026, NANR is up 19.99% year-to-date (YTD), while MOO has returned 15.03%. That puts NANR better performer ahead so far this year.
Which ETF is attracting more investor money: NANR or MOO?
Year-to-date, the NANR ETF saw -$136M in flows, compared to +$299M for MOO.
Which ETF is more volatile: NANR or MOO?
Over the past year, NANR had a volatility of 22.54%, while MOO experienced 15.71%.
Which ETF is bigger: NANR or MOO?
As of March 13, 2026, NANR holds $779.56 M in assets under management (AUM), while MOO manages $970.45 M.
What sectors do the NANR and MOO ETFs invest in?
NANR leans toward sectors like Energy and Materials. Meanwhile, MOO focuses on Consumer Staples, Materials and Industrials.
What are the top holdings of the NANR ETF and MOO ETF?
NANR top holdings include EXXON, CHEVRON TEXACO and NEWMONT CORP. MOO holds in its top three: DEERE, BAYER AG and ZOETIS INC.
Which ETF is more diversified: NANR or MOO?
NANR holds 182 securities with 48.68% of its assets in the top 15. MOO has 47 securities and a top 15 weight of 70.5%.
Calamos Investments Powers the Next Phase of the Autocallable Revolution
Join J.P. Morgan’s Bram Kaplan, Head of Americas Equity Derivatives Strategy and Matt Kaufman from Calamos Investments as they dive into the growing global opportunity in autocallable income—an increasingly dominant strategy within structured products, now available through ETFs.
Accepted for 1 CE Credit
